Efevre Tech LTD

Want to ask a research question, walk away to get on with your benchtop work, and come back to a fully worked, citation-grounded answer?

Sounds crazy, but that's the new Agentic Mode in BioSkepsis.

You set a research goal and the agent takes it from there:
🧭 Breaks your question into sub-questions
🔍 Searches the peer-reviewed literature
📄 Reads full text, not just abstracts
♻️ Critiques and iterates until the question is answered
✅ Hands back a Trust Index, with every claim traceable to its source

No keyword juggling, no 40 open tabs. Agentic Mode runs it from start to finish.

See it work in a step-by-step interactive demo 👇
https://app.supademo.com/demo/cms7idfb219crqme5j5x52q2s?utm_source=link

You published your paper two years ago. Yet last month one of its citations was retracted and nobody informed you.

That's the quiet risk in every reference list. Evidence moves, a large trial overturns an old finding, a meta-analysis weakens it, a source gets pulled and nothing flags it for you.

BioSkepsis AI 𝐄𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 does!
📋It monitors every claim you cite and re-checks it against the latest literature on a schedule you set.
🔔When something shifts, you hear about it with a notification and/or email: overturned, weakening, retracted, or superseded, most consequential first.
🚩Every flag is verified against the authoritative record, not a secondary index, so a claim is only called retracted when the record itself says so.

See it work in a step-by-step interactive demo 👇
https://app.supademo.com/demo/cms8rf9kw0sahqm681h3fazlp?utm_source=link

You can now run a full literature review without leaving Claude.

BioSkepsis is live in the Claude connector directory. Ask a life-science question in any Claude conversation, and it plans the search, reads full text where it can, and returns a citation-grounded brief instead of unsourced prose.

What that looks like in practice:
👉 Every claim traceable to a source, with ranked and tiered evidence
👉 Retracted papers, hijacked journals, and questioned cell lines screened out
👉 40M+ papers across the life sciences, and it never trains on your data
👉 Every run saves to your BioSkepsis account, tagged so nothing gets lost

The carousel walks through the whole setup: find it, approve access, toggle it on, and watch your Claude chats sync back to the app.

Free for researchers. Connect it here 🔗 https://claude.ai/directory/connectors/bioskepsis

Every AI can hand you an answer, but almost none can tell you how much you can actually 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐭 it.

The new BioSkepsis Agentic Mode scores every brief on a 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐱. Each finding is checked against the source's full text with six independent checks that show exactly how far a finding holds up before it goes into a paper or a grant.

Here is what each facet checks:
🛡️𝑮𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 checks that every claim stays within what its sources actually say. Each statement is matched to the exact passage it draws on, and the score drops when claims drift beyond the cited text.
🔖𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 whether each cited work is a real, identifiable publication with a resolvable identifier and a legitimate venue, rather than an untraceable or low-integrity source.
📊𝑬𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒉 weighs how strong the underlying studies are. A causal finding from a controlled experiment counts far more than a correlation from a single dataset.
🔁𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒄𝒊𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 checks whether a claim is corroborated across independent studies, or hangs on a single result no one else has confirmed.
⏳𝑫𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 checks whether a claim still holds against more recent literature, rather than resting on an older report that later work has moved past.
🧪𝑹𝒆𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝑽𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒚 checks whether the cell lines and antibodies behind a claim are well-characterised and validated, rather than of unknown or questionable identity.

With BioSkepsis AI Trust Index you do not just get a number. Every facet is graded and expandable, so you can open the evidence behind each score, and the verdict comes in plain language. It never buries the weak spots. It flags them and tells you exactly where to look before you cite.

See the Trust Index step by step 👉 https://app.supademo.com/demo/cms8scazz0179030jl4a8e5gz?utm_source=link

Ask any AI a research question you have no idea what they actually read or whether the citations they hand back are real or fake. They probably just read the abstract or just the title. You'll never know, because they never tell you.

𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆, 𝗽𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗯𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗿.

📝 Full Text or No Full Text, on every paper. Where an open-access version exists, the agent reads all of it. Every source carries a label showing whether an open-access version exists, to allow the agent to read the whole paper.

📓 Reading full text changes what it can tell you about the evidence itself. It flags the claim and scores how a trial documented its own design by registration, pre-set outcome, sample size, posted results, oversight.

✅ Every reference points to a real indexed paper, and every claim traces back to the exact passage it came from.

🔗 Bring a question from your own project and see what BioSkepsis AI comes back with: bioskepsis.ai/signup

You asked an AI a research question this week. Did you check whether the papers it cited were real? 👀

That question is why most researchers still won't trust AI with the actual science. A general chatbot hands you a confident answer built on references that were never written. So we built just what you were looking for!

𝐀𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞📢

You give it a research question. It plans the sub-questions, searches the literature and weights the authoritative sources, reads the full papers (methods and all, not just the abstract), weighs the supporting evidence against the contradicting evidence, and screens out retracted and hijacked-journal sources before they ever reach you.

Then it hands back a brief where every claim is cited and checked against the source text, scored with a Trust Index so you can see at a glance how much weight the evidence actually holds. An agent that does the grunt work and still shows you every step.

It was built for people on PostDoc and PhD salaries, not institutional budgets. For launch week, Plus and Pro are 25% off.
👉🏼 Comment "agentic" to receive the promo code.

Can my cat give me hantavirus?
Is it airborne or only from bites?
How deadly is it, really?

People ask these questions every day. The answers exist in the peer-reviewed literature. Scattered across dozens of papers. Behind paywalls. Written for specialists.

We ran the full synthesis on BioSkepsis — 15 verified PMIDs, every claim grounded to source, unverified citations flagged transparently.

Here's what the evidence actually says:
➡️ Transmission is primarily airborne — inhaling dust from dried rodent urine/feces, not bites
➡️ Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome kills 35–50% of patients in the Americas
➡️ There is no vaccine. No antiviral. Survival depends on early intensive care
➡️ Cats are dead-end hosts — but they bring infected rodents into your house
➡️ The single most effective prevention: wet contaminated surfaces before cleaning. That's it.

No hedging. No hallucinated citations. No "consult your doctor" cop-out where a PMID would do.

🔗 Full research thread: https://bioskepsis.ai/blog/hantavirus-transmission

📲 Your free upgrade is calling!

We are offering a 𝟱𝟬% 𝗢𝗙𝗙 discount on our 𝗣𝗿𝗼 𝗣𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗮𝗴𝗲 for 𝟯 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵𝘀. But there's a catch... It’s only for the first 20 legends who are quick enough to grab it!

Will you be one of them? 🏃💨

🔗 https://app.bioskepsis.ai/?utm_source=socialmedia&utm_medium=promo&utm_campaign=launch50pro

From unlimited hours of manual work to under 5 minutes hands-free.

We built Autopilot Mode because researchers shouldn't have to choose between manually finding papers nor waste time instructing AI tools.

Type your question. Let Autopilot read your research intent, build a targeted search strategy, run all queries in parallel, screen out irrelevant sources, and deliver you your first in-depth analysis — all while you focus on what actually matters.

The literature is vast. The questions never stop. And the time to find the right answers has always been the bottleneck ... Until now!

Swipe the slides to see how Autopilot changes things 👉

🔗 Full breakdown in the blog: https://bioskepsis.ai/blog/autopilot-mode

Scientific fields are built on a small number of landmark studies. Most researchers never encounter them directly.

BioSkepsis AI surfaces Foundational Papers: These are the landmark studies at the center of your field's citation network, identified automatically within any research query. Each Foundational Paper comes with a full breakdown of experimental models, key findings, limitations the original authors flagged, and the studies that followed.

🧑‍🔬 For Early Career Researchers, this means your thesis argumentation is grounded in verified primary evidence rather than secondary citations.
👨‍💻 For Consultants this means you can know exactly where the science in your field actually starts with a rigorous cross-checking mechanism, ensuring the claims of the scientific argument are robust.

Watch it in action [starting at 1:43 ] ➡️ https://youtu.be/MMTLO9Euhsk?si=XUu_bhtkIr7OKyXy
Full breakdown on the blog ➡️ https://bioskepsis.ai/blog/foundational-papers