Bioscience Resource Project

"On December 8th, The American Chestnut Foundation (TACF) revealed it was withdrawing its support for the Darling 58 GE blight-resistant chestnut (D58). The Darling 58 Chestnut is a genetically engineered tree variety being developed by the State University of New York Forestry School (SUNY-ESF). It is intended to resist the chestnut blight fungus that almost eradicated the American Chestnut. Currently, the D58 chestnut is the subject of a petition for deregulation by USDA. TACF is withdrawing its support because the GE trees given to them by SUNY-ESF were not Darling 58 but Darling 54, a different GE event, but primarily because the trees they were given failed to thrive even in the absence of the blight. According to documentation on the TACF website the GE trees were stunted, often chlorotic (yellow), and often developed brown leaves. Moreover, the GE chestnuts did not effectively resist the blight fungus. The onus is now on SUNY-ESF to withdraw the GE Chestnut petition or for USDA to reject it, as the introduction of genetically inferior GE trees represents a danger to surviving non-GE Chestnuts."

The American Chestnut Foundation Bails as GE Chestnut Develops Growth and Fertility Problems and Fails to Resist the Blight - Independent Science News | Food, Health and Agriculture Bioscience News by Anne Petermann of Global Justice Ecology Project Late on Friday, December 8th, the American Chestnut Foundation (TACF) announced they were withdrawing their support for the “Darling 58” (D58) genetically engineered American chestnut tree. After ...

https://www.independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/the-great-raccoon-dog-mystery/
This April and May I set off on a European tour of virology conferences that are, once more being held in person. I had a series of important questions about the origin of the COVID19 pandemic that could only be asked live and in person. I also planned to gather a lot of information about the latest research, the future of the origin controversy, and test the opinions of ordinary virologists about the origin itself. Is there, indeed, a scientific consensus? It would be a tour of the COVID origin frontline. I returned with a rich haul of insights and answers. But what I didnt expect was that merely my questions would set off a chain of events and revelations that saw me spied on, stolen from, and censored, by the scientific organisers of the third and final conference.great-raccoon-dog-mystery/

The Great Raccoon Dog Mystery - Independent Science News | Food, Health and Agriculture Bioscience News How my COVID origin frontline tour exposed the fatal flaw in the Huanan Market Theory

In April, 2023, the National Academy of Sciences held a three day workshop titled "In Vitro Derived Human Gametes as Reproductive Technology: Scientific, Ethical, and Regulatory Implications”. Stuart Newman is a Professor of Cell Biology & Anatomy at New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, and Tina Stevens Tina Stevens is Lecturer Emerita, Department of History, San Francisco State University and Director, Alliance for Humane Biotechnology. In this article the authors provide a critique of the workshop and the technology itself. They also identify the sometimes surprising individuals and institutions who are smoothing the path towards industrialised gamete production and fertilisation. These developments are happening regardless of safety and other concerns, say the authors, in particular the eugenic aspects of overtly controlled fertilisation. Read on:

Children from Gamete-like Cells: Dishing up a Eugenic Future - Independent Science News | Food, Health and Agriculture Bioscience News Laboratory-crafted humans from artificial eggs and s***m

"Putting this all together, one can see that both Chinese and Western virologists are pursuing the same general strategy, which is to ignore, discredit, deny, delete, destroy, or otherwise conceal, early sequences and samples (Bloom, 2021; Canuti et al., 2022). Erasing, or failing to collect, early information has the primary effect of lessening the likelihood that a true origin will ever be retrieved. Secondarily, erasure also makes it easier to force preferred conclusions on the data that remain. On the Chinese side, removing or failing to collect early evidence of a Wuhan outbreak helps to place the first documented appearance of the virus outside of China entirely. The Western goal has instead been to force a market spillover conclusion by preferentially discrediting samples and cases that occurred prior to the market sampling and those with no links to the market (Pekar et al., 2021 and Worobey, 2021)."

Delete, Deny, and Destroy: Chinese and Western Strategies To Erase COVID's Origin Are Being Exposed By Independent Research - Independent Science News | Food, Health and Agriculture Bioscience News Independent phylogenetic research finds that SARS-CoV-2 was preadapted to humans.

Great discussion: "The unholy alliance between the UN and the World Economic Forum in staging a Food Systems Summit is the culmination of deepening public partnerships with the corporate food sector on an international scale. This article examines how the WEF has exploited this relationship to position its private constituency to oversee global food market governance at the expense of multilateral principles, and against China’s expanding state-centered model of international self-reliance."

Shock and Awe in the UNFSS - Development The unholy alliance between the UN and the World Economic Forum in staging a Food Systems Summit is the culmination of deepening public partnerships with the corporate food sector on an international scale. This article examines how the WEF has exploited this relationship to position its private con...

GM ‘Designer Babies’: Breakthrough or Nightmare? Three years after the world’s first genetically modified babies were created, what are the implications for society?