CIVE

The case for design-build is usually made on schedule and cost. The case worth making is on risk allocation.

In a traditional construction delivery, the architect, the engineer, and the contractor all hold separate contracts with the owner. Every coordination question between those three parties has to come back to the owner. Each contract has its own gaps. When a question falls into a gap, it becomes the owner’s question by default, even when the owner is the least equipped to answer it.

In a design-build delivery, those gaps close. The party that designed the answer is the party that prices it, builds it, and stands behind it. The owner stops being the coordinator and starts being the decision-maker.

The schedule benefit follows from the risk shift. The cost certainty follows from the schedule benefit. But the real foundation is the risk reallocation, and it is the part most owners only fully understand after a fragmented project has gone sideways on them.

cive.com/Consult

Five risks every developer underestimates, and what each one tends to cost in the end.

Design coordination risk. The structural drawings show a wall in one place. The mechanical drawings show a duct in the same place. Neither set of drawings references the other. The question of who reconciles them sits between three separate contracts until someone pays for the fix on site.

Schedule float risk. Construction schedules built in buffer time can be referred as schedule float. On paper, the buffer absorbs delays. On the field, the first delay consumes the buffer, and what is consumed does not come back.

Procurement timing risk. The custom steel, the specialty equipment, the long-lead items - they take months to manufacture. If they are ordered after the drawings are finalized, they become the items that decide when the project actually gets finished.

Permit condition risk. A condition that an inspector adds after the foundation is poured is the condition that triggers a redesign. Catching it before the pour costs hours. Catching it after, costs months.

Lender review risk.When the architect and the GC disagree on a project’s achieved completion milestones, the payment application stalls until they reconcile. Working with a team that quantifies completion through 5D BIM and Virtual Design and Construction makes the answer objective instead of negotiated.

Most overruns are not one big mistake. They are five small ones that compound.



cive.com/consult

Today, we recognize Memorial Day and reflect on the sacrifice of those who served.

Construction is one of the most relationship-driven industries in the world.
 
When a project goes well, developers come back. Not because they have to because they trust the team behind it.
 
At CIVE, a large part of our pipeline comes from repeat clients. That is never accidental.
 
We measure success by whether the client returns for project number two. Then number three. Then the next opportunity after that.
By the end of a project, the best conversations are no longer just about the building we delivered - they are about what we should build together next.
 
That’s when you know you created real value.
 
cive.com/Consult