PushCorp

PushCorp

Share

PushCorp is the leading manufacturer of robotic material removal end-of-arm tooling.

06/10/2026

Let’s connect at FABTECH Canada in Toronto from June 9-11th!

PushCorp will be at the ABB Robotics Canada (12018) & Canada Welding Supply (10029) partner booth, demoing robotic material removal solutions for real manufacturing applications.

Our PushCorp XSeries robotic tooling solutions will be showcased! 🦾

This solution is designed to help manufacturers automate grinding, sanding, finishing, and weld prep processes.

If manual material removal is creating bottlenecks in your operation, this is a great opportunity to talk through the details:

➡️ Grinding challenges
➡️ Part variation
➡️ Weld prep requirements
➡️ Surface finish consistency
➡️ Labor constraints
➡️ Robotic tooling options for your application

We would also be happy to discuss whether a demo can be done using your specific production parts.

Meet the PushCorp team at FABTECH Canada and let’s explore what automated material removal could look like for your process.

06/04/2026

Grinding automation can look simple enough at first glance. A robot applies an abrasive to the surface according to a programmed path.

But once a real application moves into production, a few familiar issues usually decide whether the process actually performs well:

➡️ Part variation
➡️ Abrasive wear over time
➡️ Surface finish consistency
➡️ Spindle and abrasive selection
➡️ Programming and integration effort
➡️ Safety and cell design requirements

That is why successful grinding automation depends on more than robot motion alone.

The process has to be built around stable fixturing, proper force control, and tooling that can hold up in day-to-day production.

These are the areas where many projects run into trouble.

Especially when the application looks simple at first but becomes far more demanding once repeatability, finish quality, and uptime all have to come together.

For manufacturers evaluating robotic grinding, these challenges are worth understanding early.

PushCorp breaks down the five biggest grinding automation challenges and practical ways to approach them in our blog:
https://pushcorp.com/blog/grinding-automation-challenges/

We’ll be ready to talk force compliance, end-of-arm tooling, and robotic grinding at Automate 2026. Visit Booth #2814.

06/03/2026

Manual beveling is hard to scale properly.
And it is often a critical preparation step across the entire batch.

It takes time, depends heavily on operator consistency, and adds another physically demanding step to the process.

But most of all, a bevel is usually a foundation for a solid welding joint. Any inconsistency here shows downstream.

Manual beveling creates familiar problems:

➡️ Variation from part to part
➡️ More manual handling
➡️ Added labor pressure
➡️ Difficulty maintaining consistent edge quality

However, robotic beveling offers a more controlled approach.

Instead of relying on manual techniques from part to part, manufacturers can create a process that is more repeatable, more predictable, and easier to standardize across production.

Unlike some manual material removal methods that generate large amounts of dust or swarf, using the right automated beveling tool can produce metal chips.

This helps reduce airborne particulates and cross-contamination.

For manufacturers looking to improve bevel quality while reducing manual effort, the right robotic spindle, tooling, and process approach can make a major difference.

See this video demonstration!
Let’s connect in Chicago and talk about what’s next in robotic automation. Find PUSHCORP at Booth #2814.

06/02/2026

Choosing the right spindle for robotic material removal starts with two things:

➡️ Required RPM
➡️ Expected motor load from the abrasive or cutter

Both matter.

Because the right spindle is about matching spindle capability to the actual demands of the application. It’s not enough to look at speed.

In this demo, PushCorp shows how that changes across different tools:

➡️ A 5-inch random orbital sanding tool runs at high RPM with low compliance pressure and creates very low motor load
➡️ A 4.5-inch fiber disc requires slower RPM and higher compliance force, increasing motor load but staying well within spindle capability
➡️ A 7-inch fiber disc with more compliance force pushes that same spindle to its limit

That is why spindle selection should always be tied to the process, not just the tool diameter alone.

RPM, abrasive type, disc size, and applied force all affect whether a spindle is the right fit or whether the application calls for more capability.

See this video demonstration!

The PUSHCORP team will be on-site in Chicago and ready to talk applications, challenges, and solutions. Visit Booth #2814.

6 Companies Driving Automation in Mexico 05/29/2026

We are honoured to be featured by the Association for Advancing Automation (A3) as one of the companies driving automation in Mexico.

At PushCorp, we are proud to support Mexican manufacturers as they automate real-world industrial processes, build technical capacity, and prepare for the next phase of the country’s industrial growth.

From sanding, polishing, grinding, deburring, weld grinding, and material removal to force-controlled robotic finishing, our mission is to help manufacturers solve challenging production problems with reliable, proven automation.

Mexico’s manufacturing sector is entering an exciting new chapter, and we are grateful to be part of the ecosystem helping make advanced automation more accessible, practical, and impactful.

Thank you to A3 for the recognition.

Read the full article here:
https://www.automate.org/robotics/blogs/6-companies-driving-automation-in-mexico

6 Companies Driving Automation in Mexico We’re highlighting the work of six members of the A3 Mexico community, from global technology leaders to regional integrators and specialized tooling providers on their contribution to the automation industry in Mexico.

05/28/2026

What does it cost to lose a customer due to manual grinding bottlenecks?

Potentially years of future revenue, not just one delayed order.

When grinding becomes a constraint, the damage rarely stops at the grinding cell.

It starts to spread through the operation:
➡️ Throughput slows down
➡️ Finish consistency becomes harder to maintain
➡️ Delivery pressure increases
➡️ Production becomes less predictable

Over time, those issues can begin to affect something even more important than daily output: customer confidence.

When a customer sees inconsistent quality or unreliable delivery, they are not just judging one finishing step.

They are judging your ability to deliver consistently as a supplier.

That is where the real cost of manual grinding bottlenecks starts to grow. What appears to be a shop-floor constraint can turn into a business problem with lasting consequences.

For manufacturers looking more closely at where these costs show up, PushCorp put together a free ebook on the hidden costs behind manual grinding.

Download it on our here:
https://pushcorp.com/guide-manual-grinding-20-hidden-costs/

05/27/2026

❌ Grinding welded corners can quickly become a quality issue.

It’s challenging to manually apply the grinder consistently across a part batch where two surfaces meet at an angle.

With corner grinding usually requiring more attention, it also becomes an operational bottleneck.

Welders spend more time grinding corners and less time welding.

✅ That’s why grinding corners with a robot can resolve both issues:
1. Achieve consistent finish quality with maximum reliability
2. Remove the manual grinding bottleneck

However, grinding corners with a robot is tricky.

The robotic tooling must compensate for the difference in required contact pressure as it moves around the edge.

And the best solution is to use a spindle with an active compliance device.

In practice, this means the compliance device will automatically update the contact pressure in real time as the grinding disk engages different parts of the weld on the edge.

See how PushCorp robotic grinding systems handle corner welds in this demo.

05/26/2026

Robotic material removal becomes far more capable when automatic tool changing is part of the process. 🦾

Need to grind down a weld?
The robot can pick up a grinding disc on its own.

But what if the surface must be refined afterward? 🤔
The robot can return that tool and switch to a sanding abrasive for finishing.

All of it can be programmed in advance and executed without manual intervention.

That is where automation starts to move beyond a single task and becomes a more complete manufacturing process.

In many applications, details like tool changing are what make the difference between a process that seems difficult to automate and one that can be fully robotized.

See this video demonstration.

05/21/2026

Cutting aluminum casting trees manually puts operators close to rotating blades, heavy parts, and a secondary cleanup step immediately after separation.

That is why this application deserves a closer look.

Automating casting tree cut-offs with robotics can reduce operator risk while improving consistency and process reliability.

In this PushCorp demo, robotic riser removal on lost foam aluminum castings is evaluated as a way to:

➡️ Reduce operator exposure
➡️ Improve cut consistency
➡️ Handle cutoff more predictably
➡️ Move closer to minimizing downstream sanding

Tooling configuration, cut angle, sequencing, and fixturing all play a major role in whether the process simply separates parts or meaningfully improves the downstream workflow.

See the demo here!

05/20/2026

[👉 Download link below!]
Manual grinding creates a cycle that costs more than most shops realize.

You bring in skilled welders, fabricators, and machinists.

They need time to learn your equipment, standards, and workflow.

Then, too much of their day gets pulled into repetitive grinding work.

❌ Productivity drops.
❌ Frustration builds.
❌ People leave.

And the cycle starts again:

➡️ Recruiting
➡️ Training
➡️ Reduced productivity
➡️ Turnover

You invest in skilled labor, only to have too much of their time pulled into grinding until frustration and burnout pushes them out. This is one of the major hidden costs of manual grinding.

For manufacturers dealing with labor pressure and grinding bottlenecks, this problem tends to run deeper than it first appears.

That is one of the reasons why PushCorp put together a free ebook on the 20 hidden costs of manual grinding and where they show up across the operation.

Download it here:
https://pushcorp.com/guide-manual-grinding-20-hidden-costs/

Want your business to be the top-listed Engineering Company in Garland?
Click here to claim your Sponsored Listing.

Telephone

Address


3001 W Kingsley Road
Garland, TX
75041