Bible Doctrines

PART 2

Exodus 4:24, is certainly shrouded in ambiguity. It was not Moses that was in danger- it was his son. In Hebrew, it uses the personal pronoun without a using a name. I've read the Mishnah, Torah and read all the texts from these Jewish and Christian scholars. Some are saying it was Moses and others is naming Moses' son. I truly believe it was his son and not Moses himself.

PART I

In Exodus 4:24, has an ambiguous text- many has believed; that God wanted to kill Moses. However, this fallacious eisegesis of the scriptures.

I will explain Exodus 4:24 and it is very simple; you do not need to study the Bible for twenty years or learn from higher institution. The syntax grammar in KJV or NIV or any translations, the pronoun did not include the name, MOSES.

The syntax for NIV however, used the name Moses. E.g., (Ex. 4:20) "At a lodging place on the way, the Lord met MOSES and was about to kill him." NIV.

The KJV syntax is (Exodus 4:20) "And it came to pass the way inn, that the Lord met him and sought to kill him."

Who was him? It was not Moses; the Hebrew syntax did not name Moses; it was the same translation for the KJV.

The Doctrine of Soteriology:
1 Timothy 2:4: "God wants everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.

Notice in the scriptures in 1 Timothy 2:4, the Lord wants "ALL" to be saved. I did not indicate, partial, some or a few, or perhaps anyone that chooses to believe, it gives clear understanding of everyone.
This defines the will of the Lord, however, in Isaiah 55:11. "So shall My words be that goes forth out of My mouth; it shall not return to me void- it will prosper in the things I sent it."

There are those who do not believe, and throughout the Bible and the New Testament of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Is this a problem or a contradiction of Isaiah 55? Has the Lord's will- return to Him void because of disbelief? Or is it because of "free-will?" If man is free, then Lord is not sovereign. People would say that the Lord does not force His will on anyone. However, in my opinion- the Lord does not need anyone's permission.

This is just an example of in-depth understanding of the Doctrine of Soteriology or (Salvation). A systematic teaching throughout the scriptures of mankind's destiny and there are those who destined to be saved and those are not, because it validates of a fabrication of mankind's free will.

This is very interesting, Isaiah 49:1, KJV “Listen O’ islands unto Me,” The concept of islands in the Bible invites believers to reflect on their spiritual journey. You can identify the Holy Trinty in this verse, in Hebrew, “Shamu Iyim Elay.” Shamu (Do listen) Iyim (Islands) Elay (My Gods) In NIV, NJV or any Biblical translations has used only, (to me) rather than, (my gods).

In Hebrew to say, “to me” is, “Ani”. However, in the original Hebrew text- it is used, “Elay instead of Ani.” What is the exegesis of this text? “DO LISTEN PEOPLE OF THEIR SPIRTUAL JOURNEY TO MY GODS.” And who is speaking? The Redeemer, and He Is Jesus Christ. Because it is the prophesy of Messiahship and His birth.

“Plural Majestic or the Sovereign We,” clearly doesn't exist in the Hebrew dialect, it was first used in western culture during the 13th century monarchs or high-ranking officials in socially stratified cultures. Those who deny the Trinity have acculturated this term of identified the plurality of “Elohim” which is plural, (gods). They have suggested that the reason it is plural majestic in its excellence; is to maintain monotheism. However, the problem is that- plural majestic is only followed by a quote and Ezekiel had written this book in the Bible and was never used- the “sovereign we” as in plural majestic. In fact, plural majesty or the “sovereign we " was never used in Semitic culture.



The Book of Ezekiel was written 598 B.C and, e,g., Ezekiel 34:8 “As I live saith the Lord.” Ezekiel 34:10 “I am against the shepherd, and I will require.” Ezekeil 34:11 “For thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I even I will both search my sheep.” Ez 34:13 “I will bring them out.” Ez 34:14 “I will feed them.” Ez 34:16 “I will judge.” EZ 34:17: I will destroy.” EZ 34:20 “I even I will judge them.” Ez 34:24 “I the Lord will be their God.” Throughout chapter 34, there is the Sovreign Lord with all the majestic titles of, I and I even I. Therefor the majestic plurality or the sovereign we- clearly does not exist.



The fallacy is that the proponents of anti-Trinitarians have used this example of the “Plural Majestic” to a noun of “Elohim” of why it is plural rather than singular. These Old Testament authors, Moses, Isaiah and Ezekeil had never intended to use the sovereign we or plural majestic into their writings. Because it never existed until the 11th century. If anyone has ever used this example of plural majestic as they deny the Trinity- you could use this against them- by saying, "The plural majestic or the sovereign we” did not exist within the Biblical writings.”

The Trinity is often attacked within the Biblical scriptures and denied to almost every aspect of the text to form their eisegesis in their desperate attempt to change the very fundamentals of the Holy Scriptures, (e.g, Plural of Majesty). The Plural Majestic or the sovereign “we”, first used in European monarchy- when a king or queen addressed the country during the 4th century. Which is usually followed by a quote. The king or queen is singular personal pronoun, addressing the people as, “we” and always followed by a verb.

The Hebrew word, “Elohim” is, “Gods” plurality and not singular. And those who opposes the Trinity often uses the “Plural of Majesty or Plural of Excellence” this is nosism, plain and simple. Another example, in Genesis. “Let Us create man in Our image.” I often debated heretics in YouTube comments and in my page and challenged their rebuttal- because it is pure fallacy! If anyone has ever studied Semitc language and the grammar would immediately concur that is false- there is no examples of plural of majestic is found anywhere in the Old Testament scriptures.

Semitic grammar and the language are entirely different than the Western culture- the poetic linguistic grammar of Hebrew dialect. King David never used, the plural of majestic quotes, or the “sovereign we?