Keil Defense

Two domestic assault cases dismissed on the eve of trial.

In one case, my client was facing the possibility of prison. In another, my client’s career and future were on the line.

Domestic assault allegations carry enormous consequences long before a jury ever hears the evidence. Jobs, families, housing, reputations, and freedom can all be at risk.

These cases required the kind of defense work that often happens in the details: reviewing reports line by line, challenging assumptions, testing the State’s evidence, and finding the inconsistencies that matter.

In one case, a critical documentation issue raised serious concerns about whether the alleged victim actually understood what police had her sign. In another, the evidence simply did not hold up when placed under pressure.

Tough advocacy still matters. Preparation still matters. And using AI as a strategic second chair helped us dig deeper, faster, and more precisely — finding small inconsistencies that helped expose major weaknesses in the prosecution’s cases.

Both clients walked away without domestic assault convictions.

Criminal defense has changed. Most lawyers have not.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

A new article quotes legal experts saying what I've believed for a while: the day is coming when failing to use AI tools in a client's case could be a breach of the standard of care.

The whole profession had the same chance to start learning this. Most didn't. They waited for permission, for a rule, for someone else to go first.

The handful who started early now have a real advantage — and it's the kind that gets harder to catch up to every month.
If you've been on the fence, this is your sign. Begin now. The window's still open, but it's narrowing.

Experts foresee possible legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI As reports of hallucinated case citations and other misadventures have some lawyers pumping the brakes on embracing generative artificial intelligence tools, experts say the day is coming when failure to use available AI technology in representing a client may be deemed a breach of the standard of c...

I've been saying this for a while: AI is coming to the courtroom whether the bar is ready or not. California courts are already piloting it for case summaries, legal research, and ruling assistance.

And it's not just the bench. The tools exist right now to transcribe hearings in real time, surface case law on the fly at counsel table, summarize thousands of pages of discovery in minutes, and put meaningful legal help in the hands of people who could never afford a lawyer. That's not science fiction. That's this year.

The old way of practicing law is dying. The attorneys (and judges) who refuse to understand the new way are going to die with it.

Love it or hate it, AI is here. MRPC 1.1, Comment 8 — mirroring the ABA Model Rules — requires lawyers to keep abreast of "the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology." ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 2024) made it explicit: generative AI IS relevant technology. Keeping up is not optional.

I'd argue refusing to become fluent in AI is no longer just a competitive disadvantage. It's edging into malpractice territory.

That's exactly why I'm presenting a CLE this August in Hennepin and Ramsey counties — The First Pitch Hasn't Been Thrown: A Lawyer's Field Guide to AI. We'll cover what's already in the courtroom, what's coming next, the ethics rules you need to know, and the practical workflows changing how cases get built. Details coming soon.

Can AI Be Trusted Inside the Courtroom? A new CalMatters report says courts in Los Angeles and Riverside County are testing artificial intelligence tools to help summarize cases, draft legal research, and potentially assist in rulings. Supporters say the technology could help reduce major court backlogs, while critics warn it may introduc...

Successful result after a contested restitution hearing.

The State was seeking restitution from my client, but after challenging the request, the Court reduced the amount by approximately $3,000.

Restitution can have a real financial impact on a person’s life, and these hearings matter. Even after the criminal case itself appears resolved, it is important to carefully review what is being requested, whether the amount is supported, and whether the law allows it.

I also have to give credit to my Second Chair — AI — which took my ideas, helped execute the strategy, and assisted in identifying holes, inconsistencies, and weaknesses in the restitution request.

Technology does not replace advocacy, preparation, or courtroom judgment. But when used correctly, it can help sharpen the defense and make sure nothing gets overlooked.

Proud to have helped protect my client from an unsupported financial obligation.

Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

🚨 URGENT MN CONSUMER ALERT: NEW TARGETED BAIL SCAM 🚨

​A devastating and highly sophisticated version of the "bail scam" is currently targeting families across Minnesota. Unlike the typical random "relative-in-distress" call, this scheme is targeted and leverages real events.

​How it works:

​Scammers utilize publicly available arrest data (like public jail rosters) to identify families. They already know a real loved one has been arrested.

​The caller poses as a legitimate figure—a court clerk, a public defender, or a specific representative from a known bail bonds company.

​They contact the family with precise, real-life details of the arrest to create false legitimacy and belief.

​They immediately demand payment (often via specific methods like the stack of gift cards shown in the graphic) to secure the loved one's release, using extreme urgency and high pressure.

​RED FLAGS — Never trust a call that demands:

​Immediate Pressure: Money is needed right now to "secure release" or to "prevent more charges."

​Requests for Specific, Untraceable Payment: They ask you to pay via gift cards, wire transfer, cryptocurrency, or to meet in a non-official location with cash. NO legitimate court, jail, or official agency will ever ask for payment this way.

​Isolation and Secrecy: They will explicitly tell you not to speak with other family members or contact the jail/police directly to "keep things moving" or to "avoid extra trouble." This is a tactic to isolate you.

​PROTECT YOURSELF & YOUR FAMILY:

👉 HANG UP.

👉 FIND OFFICIAL CONTACT INFO YOURSELF. Do not use any numbers provided by the caller. Use a number from an official government website (.gov) to find the jail or court.

👉 CALL THE JAIL OR COURT DIRECTLY using the official number to verify any arrest, bail status, and the identity of any individual claiming to represent them.

👉 VERIFY THE INDIVIDUAL. If they claim to be a public defender or specific official, call their known office number (found via an official search) to confirm their identity.

​Share this post to save a loved one from being a victim of this cruel and targeted scheme. Awareness of this specific tactic is critical for defense.

⚠️ MINNESOTA FAMILIES — READ THIS BEFORE YOU SEND A DIME.

A serious bail scam is targeting Minnesota families right now, and it's more convincing than you'd expect. Criminals are pulling real names off public jail rosters, calling family members, and impersonating bail bond agents, sheriffs, and court officials — then demanding immediate payment through Venmo, Cash App, Apple Pay, Bitcoin, or gift cards.

Here's what you need to know:

🚫 The Sheriff's office, jail, and court staff will NEVER call you to arrange bail payment.
🚫 No legitimate bail bond agency will demand payment through Venmo, Cash App, or gift cards. Ever.
🚫 In Minnesota, it's actually illegal for a bail bond agent to solicit you unless they've already spoken directly with the defendant or you have an existing relationship with that company.

If you get a call like this — STOP. Hang up. Look up the jail's official number independently and call to verify whether your loved one is actually in custody. Do not use any number the caller gives you.

These scammers are exploiting the worst moment a family can face. They know that panic makes people act fast without thinking. That's exactly what they're counting on.

If you've been targeted, contact your local law enforcement and your financial institution immediately.

Please share this — especially with elderly family members, who are the most frequently targeted.

📰 Full article:

Urgent consumer alert: Minnesota families targeted in bail scam A growing and highly deceptive scam is impacting families across Minnesota, with criminals impersonating bail bond agents, law enforcement, and court officials in an effort to steal money from unsuspecting

🚨 Breaking News Update: The Minnesota Supreme Court has issued their ruling in the landmark case regarding the constitutionality of "geofence warrants." Here are the key takeaways: 📍

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that geofence warrants are NOT unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
The warrants can continue to be used by law enforcement in Minnesota for digital investigations.
However, the court placed NEW LIMITATIONS on their use — requiring "particularity" linking the targeted location data directly to probable cause the crime occurred there.
What does this mean going forward?

Police can still employ geofence tools in MN but now need to show more direct links between a phone's location and a specific crime before a judge will sign off.
The "good faith exception" also means some evidence gathered unconstitutionally might still be allowed at trial if the police thought they were following legal precedent at the time.
What are your thoughts on this ruling? Do you feel it strikes the right privacy balance — or do you have lingering concerns about digital surveillance in our state? Weigh in with your perspective below! 🗣️

There is no better feeling than calling a client to say, 'We won.' Today, an innocent man was cleared of false allegations aimed at ending his role as a father. It was a long road to expose the lies, but the evidence spoke for itself. So glad I could help this family stay whole.