Official NTEU Chapter 73

Federal agencies are doing a big push to remove all evidence of your union.

Just another strategy to make employees feel like they have no one in their corner & THAT’S JUST NOT TRUE!!

NTEU IS STILL HERE!! & WE’RE STILL FIGHTING FOR YOUR RIGHTS

Sooo, I’m challenging EVERYONE who supports NTEU to wear your NTEU gear; t-shirt, lanyard, sweater, hat or WHATEVER you might have on this upcoming TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 2026.

Then take a selfie, in your gear, post it with to show off your NTEU PRIDE!!

LET’S DO THIS!

The President signed an executive order that purports to strip job protections for thousands of career civil servants, making them easier to fire. NTEU will continue to fight this harmful order: https://bit.ly/4ufLNQE

https://www.facebook.com/share/1BCmg38pYf/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Use of Overtime Increased as Staff Decreased at IRS, Says IG

As the IRS cut its staff by about a quarter last year, use of overtime by employees still remaining increased by 12 percent through last September, an inspector general audit has found in the latest of an emerging series reports on the impact of the workforce cuts there and at other agencies.

That increase essentially offset a 14 percent reduction in regular working hours in the first nine months of 2025 “as employees were terminated, retired, or took the deferred resignation programs and were placed on administrative leave,” it said. Continues, link in comments 👇

Congratulations 👏🏻 👏🏻 👏🏻

The First Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, upheld the preliminary injunction reinstating the largest collective bargaining agreement for VA employees. The First Circuit has denied the VA's plea for an emergency stay; as a result, the preliminary injunction granted to the NVAC by Judge DuBose on March 13th, 2026, stays in place. This is a milestone worth recognizing and a reminder that when we stand together, we can make a difference for VA employees and U.S. veterans everywhere.

In their decision denying the VA’s emergency motion to stay the preliminary injunction, the three-judge panel stated,

“[T]he defendants have not shown that the preliminary injunction likely was issued in error. Accordingly, we must separately account for the public's interest in the CBA – which is provided for and governed by federal law – being kept in place as a binding agreement until lawfully terminated.

“The defendants have not made the requisite ‘strong showing’ in their stay motion that they are likely to succeed in challenging the preliminary injunction in their pending appeal. Nor have they shown that staying that injunction in the interim would not cause substantial injury to the plaintiffs or the public.”

Stop over today !!

Stress is rising.
Uncertainty is real.

But so is our strength. 💪

Help keep our unity strong. Stay informed. Stay engaged.

We are still actively fighting for your rights, your pay, and your future.

This fight isn’t over until we win !!

🗳️ UNITED WE VOTE 🇺🇸

💙 Please make sure that you are a part of our members only page. Updates are no longer able to be posted here for public viewing! 💙