Wexeres

FOREST SECURITY (SERVICE) BILL
The recent Forest Protection Bill that was passed into law by the Federal Government of Nigeria has seen various voluntary bodies springing up and jostling for the role.
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF MAN O' WAR NIGERIA IN NATIONAL SECURITY?
Man O' War, a Federal Government Owned (Voluntary) Paramilitary organisation under the Federal Ministry of Youths Development, and overseen by the Citizenship and Leadership Training Centre has continually been neglected by the Federal Government of Nigeria despite the organisation's positive impact to National Security, School Security, Youth building (NYSC), and the likes.
Man O' War has able bodied men and women (with a confirmed) verified personnel strength of 12000+, all having a centralised Service Number issued to them by the National Command.
Is the Federal Government saying that Man O' War is a waste of promising youths' time, resources, strength and loyalty and patriotism? Over time, we've seen new organisations come and engaged by the Federal Government, but Man O' War caste aside. This is unfair to youths and personnel of the organisation that have dedicated their lives to the Service of the country, and a mockery of such.
WHAT IS THE ESSENCE OF LOYALTY AND PATRIOTISM WHEN IT IS NOT RECOGNISED?
The Federal Government of Nigeria can do better and make use of the readily available organised structure/platform available in Man O' War instead of creating and looking for fresh non structured body that has to go through unnecessary basic (training) that have been taught Man O' War personnel called 'Warbays'.
It is high time the Federal Government take Man O' War as a valuable body in the country security, or scrap it if they find no use for he, rather than continually waste her members' life on the altar of VOLUNTEERISM.

Copyright: WEXERES NG

A*o Rock Villa
Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu
Federal Government of Nigeria
Nigerian Presidency
MAN O' WAR NATIONAL TV
Nigeria Police Force
Defence Headquarters Nigeria
HQ Nigerian Army
Nigerian Navy
Nigerian Air Force HQ
Punch Newspapers
thisdaylive.com
Guardian Nigeria
Channels Television

NAF MAKES HISTORY: OFFICIALLY ABSORBS FIRST SET OF EX-JAWs AS AIRWOMEN

In a groundbreaking move for gender inclusion, the Nigerian Air Force (NAF) has officially welcomed its first set of Ex-Junior Air Women (Ex-JAWs) into its ranks as Airwomen. This historic development comes as the NAF extends its Absorption Policy, initially designed exclusively for graduates of the Air Force Military School (AFMS), known as Ex-Junior Air Men (Ex-JAMs), to include their female counterparts from Air Force Girls' Military School (AFGMS). The policy review now opens up exciting career opportunities for young women interested in serving in the NAF as Non-Commissioned Officers.

The first beneficiaries of this transformative policy are the members of the AFGMS Class of 2017, who graduated in August 2023. After a rigorous selection process, these young women entered the 2024 NAF recruitment training at NAF Base, Kaduna, where they successfully completed their military training. They have now proudly joined the NAF ranks, marking a new chapter in the history of gender equality within the service.

The policy revision not only provides Ex-JAWs with a direct pathway to military service but also opens doors to educational and professional growth through the NAF’s training programmes. For many of these women, this opportunity represents more than a career, it offers a future built on pride, purpose, and empowerment.

The Chief of the Air Staff (CAS), Air Marshal Hasan Bala Abubakar, expressed his vision stating, "This is a moment of triumph for every girl who has ever dreamed of wearing the uniform. It is a testament to the Air Force’s commitment to empowering young women and ensuring equal opportunities for all."

The newly absorbed Airwomen, shaped by the discipline and leadership instilled at AFGMS, are set to contribute significantly to the NAF and the nation. The CAS noted that “over the past 39 years, AFGMS has produced more than 3,500 graduates who have gone on to lead in various sectors, including the Armed Forces, government, academia, and other corporations”.

As these pioneering women step into their roles, they carry with them not just a legacy of achievement but also the message that gender is no barrier to excellence, service, or nation-building. They are not just making history; they are rewriting it.
Source: Nigerian Air Force HQ

Riyadh Talks: The U.S. Learns to Bow to Reality — Russia Defines the New World Order

The unipolar era is dead. Washington just spent 4.5 hours in Riyadh learning a hard lesson: it no longer dictates terms to the world. The deep state’s mouthpieces can dress it up as “productive dialogue,” but the reality is brutal: Russia crushed the Western proxy war in Ukraine, and the U.S. now has to negotiate its own managed retreat.

It’s almost poetic. Washington, the self-proclaimed enforcer of the “rules-based order,” now sitting across from Lavrov and Ushakov, taking notes like a chastened student. This is Yalta 2.0, but this time it’s the U.S. being dictated to.

One of the key takeaways? “We couldn’t have imagined a better result,” Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff admitted after the session. Translation? Washington had to swallow Russia’s terms just to keep the talks moving. The days of “isolating” Moscow are ancient history. Now the U.S. is agreeing to normalize relations, restore embassies, and appoint negotiators to work out Ukraine’s surrender terms.

And let’s be clear: Kiev was never at the table. While Zelensky throws tantrums from the sidelines, begging for relevance, Washington and Moscow have already accepted that he’s finished. His re-election chances are zero. His NATO dreams are dead. His future? Probably some exile villa funded by whatever’s left of the billions he siphoned off.

But the real conversation in Riyadh wasn’t about Ukraine. It was about what comes next. The Americans walked in pretending they still had leverage, but walked out knowing they now need to negotiate their place in the new multipolar reality. No more NATO expansion. No more economic terrorism through sanctions. No more delusions of forcing Russia into submission.

The empire is being forced to cut a deal. This is the deep state’s worst nightmare: Washington, once the global hegemon, now begging to “normalize” relations with the very country it tried to destroy. From “crippling Russia” to “respecting Russia’s interests” in less than two years.

This is what empire collapse looks like. For years, Washington dictated terms to the world. Now, it has to ask permission just to stay in the game. The Pentagon knows it lost the war in Ukraine. The next phase is about managing the American retreat from global hegemony, because the new world is already being built, and the U.S. is no longer in charge.

- Gerry Nolan

THE INTERDEPENDENCY OF UKRAINE’S RARE EARTH MINERALS AND U.S. MILITARY AID: A GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSIS
The war in Ukraine has created a complex interdependence between Kyiv’s vast mineral resources and U.S. military support under President Donald Trump. This dynamic intersects with Russia’s territorial ambitions and global power struggles over critical raw materials. Here’s a breakdown of the key elements shaping this relationship:

1. UKRAINE’S STRATEGIC MINERALS: A BARGAINING CHIP FOR SURVIVAL
Ukraine holds significant reserves of **lithium, titanium, uranium, graphite**, and other minerals critical for modern industries like aerospace, electronics, and green energy. These resources, valued at **$14.8–26 trillion**, are largely untapped due to the war and regulatory challenges .
- **Key Deposits**: Lithium reserves (33 million tons, worth $38 billion) and titanium (7% of global reserves) are particularly sought after by the U.S. and EU to reduce reliance on China, which dominates rare earth production .
- **Russian Occupation**: An estimated 40% of Ukraine’s metallic minerals are in regions under Russian control, including lithium deposits in Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk .

Ukraine has proposed trading access to these resources for continued U.S. military aid, framing it as a way to “secure American investment” and prevent Russia from capturing remaining deposits .

2. TRUMP’S TRANSACTIONAL APPROACH: AID FOR MINERALS
President Trump has conditioned future U.S. military assistance on Ukraine granting access to its minerals, reflecting his transactional foreign policy style.
- **Demands**: Trump has floated a $500 billion “equivalent” in rare earths or other minerals in exchange for aid, arguing the U.S. must “get something” for its support .
- **Negotiations**: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is set to visit Ukraine to finalize terms, which would require legislation, geological surveys, and security guarantees for U.S. companies operating in conflict zones .

This contrasts with the Biden administration’s emphasis on defending Ukraine’s sovereignty, highlighting a shift toward economic pragmatism over ideological solidarity .

3. RUSSIA’S GEOPOLITICAL CALCULUS
Russia’s invasion has targeted resource-rich regions like Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia, aiming to control Ukraine’s mineral wealth and weaken its economic viability .
- **Kremlin’s Response**: Russia praised Trump’s suggestion that Ukraine “may be Russian someday,” framing it as validation of its annexation claims .
- **Strategic Threat**: If Russia captures more territory, it could monopolize critical minerals, further destabilizing global supply chains and bolstering its leverage in energy and tech sector.

4. CHALLENGES FOR UKRAINE
- **War Constraints**: Mining operations are hindered by frontline hostilities, drone attacks, and inadequate geological data .
- **EU Ambitions**: The European Commission sees Ukraine as a future supplier of over 20 critical raw materials, contingent on EU membership and regulatory reforms .
- **Sovereignty Risks**: Critics warn that U.S. or EU exploitation of minerals could undermine Ukraine’s post-war recovery unless local industries retain control over processing and value creation .

5. GLOBAL IMPLICATIONS
- **Decoupling from China**: The U.S. imports 95% of its titanium and relies heavily on China for rare earths. Ukraine’s resources offer diversification but require massive investment to develop .
- **Trump-Putin Dynamics**: Trump and Putin have signaled openness to bilateral negotiations, potentially sidelining Ukraine in peace talks. This could legitimize Russian territorial gains in exchange for nuclear arms control or trade deals .

CONCLUSION
The Ukraine war has become a battleground for control of critical minerals, with Trump leveraging military aid to secure resources and Putin exploiting territorial gains to strengthen Russia’s global influence. For Ukraine, balancing immediate survival with long-term sovereignty remains precarious. The outcome will hinge on whether Western investments can outpace Russian advances—and whether transactional geopolitics erode the principles of self-determination that Kyiv fights to uphold.

RELATED DEVELOPMENTS
- The Munich Security Conference (February 14–16) will address Ukraine’s mineral strategy and Trump’s proposed deal .
- The U.S.-Ukraine memorandum of understanding on minerals, drafted under Biden, may be revised to reflect Trump’s demands.

Please follow, like, comments, share, invite friends to our page 🙏🏾