Clean Ecosystem Foundation

While flooding is a natural phenomenon, we accept that unbridled anthropogenic activities are responsible for 75% of the causes of flooding across the globe.

This is Texas in the United States of America.
Let's be intentional in living a life that ensure a safer and better environment which we will bequeath to future generations .

Let's Protect our environment.
Picture credit:Dr. Endurance Keyamo

ENHANCING MOBILITY IN RURAL DWELLERS.

Due to the challenging terrain and limited transportation infrastructure, residents and locals face significant difficulties in accessing essential areas related to oil exploration and exploitation activities. This has not only hampered economic efficiency but also affected the community’s development and well-being.

In light of these challenges, we humbly support in providing vehicles and motorcycles to the community. This initiative aims to:

1. Improve Access – Ensure timely movement of persons and goods across the communities .

2. Enhance Productivity – Increase efficiency in day-to-day operations.

3. Boost Economic Development – Facilitate better community engagement and economic activities.

TINUBU, NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, URGED TO PAY $100B TO NIGER DELTA OIL COMMUNITIES.
BY
THE NEWS GIANT
FEBRUARY 7, 2025.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the National Assembly have been asked to work out the payment of $100 billion to oil producing communities in the Niger Delta.

The fund is compensation for years of oil exploration and exploitation, which the group said has led to irreversible damages to the livelihood and the ecosystem.

The group said the fund will douse raging tension, hopelessness and should be paid into a special account, to be administered by oil producing states in collaboration with local and international environmental groups.

The Clean Ecosystem Foundation which was registered in 2019, in the report issued at the weekend said the recommendation came after a month long tour of nine oil producing states in Niger Delta.

The fact-finding tour made up of seven environmental experts began in earlier January and ended this week.

“There is the urgent need for the Presidency and the National Assembly to pay $100b to oil producing communities in the Niger-Delta. This fund is needed very urgently, specifically to address provision of health facilities, replenishment of floundering rare animals, plants and fish species which have been devastated for the past 65 years.

The fund should also focus on reviving fishing and agriculture and should be worked out urgently before it is too late,” Clean Ecosystem said in the statement signed by the group’s Executive Director, Mr Isaac Onome. He said he would work with local and international organizations to exert pressure on the Nigerian Government to make payment of the $100b this year.

He recalled that the leadership of the group led by Onome once med the former Vice President of the United States, Al Gore who indicated deep interests in the challenges faced by people from oil producing communities in Nigeria.

The group said the oil producing communities are currently not feeling enough the direct impact of government’s various interventions due to bureaucracy and the existence of local and national cabals that have taken over funds allocated through the various state-driven agencies.

The organization said the experts conducted extensive medical, biological and carbon emission tests which indicated that life expectancy in oil producing communities in the Niger Delta have been reduced to half of what it used to be 65 years ago.

Onome decried the absence of medical facilities, lack of access of oil producing communities to healthcare, lack of access to drinkable water, significant loss of absence of protein which is essential for growth and the abundance of carbon monoxide and other gas and oil related emissions which combine to destroy livelihood of the people in the oil producing communities.

“We met no fewer than 5000 people and conducted medical tests on thousands of people and soil test in several communities. The conclusion is that the Niger Delta is a walking corpse,” the group said.

While it acknowledges the creation of the Niger Delta Development Commission, (NDDC), the existence of the Petroleum Industrial Act,(PIB) but said they are not retroactive to deal with historical injustice that bedeviled the Niger Delta prior the creation of those institutions.

The group said the FG has consistently given special grants to the North East and North West even with the existence of Development commissions in the two regions.

This is the reason why the Federal Government needs a multi-dimensional approach that directly address the needs of oil producing communities in Niger Delta, the group said.

Clean Ecosystem said millions of people from oil producing communities are exposed to cancer, skin and eye irritations, low birth weight, preterm birth, decreased immunity, reproductive problems, neurological impairments, heart problems, asthma and dizziness arising from oil and gas exploration.

The group said, “it was the first time in recent time that any civil society organization visited all the oil producing communities without exception to conduct soil and blood tests on a large scale, meeting with the people, sharing their experiences and documenting them for posterity”.

He said the NDDC and the Petroleum Industry Act cannot address the affliction of the past, whereas the injustice of the past 65 years are monumental and can never be wished away. The group said apart from obstacles associated with political interference, the current instruments do no reach majority of people in oil producing communities.

The Niger Delta Development Council, NDDC was established by former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo on the June 5, 2000, with the sole mandate of developing the oil rich Niger Delta Region. As of November 2024, Nigeria’s oil production was 1.8 million barrels per day.

ISRAELI AIRSTRIKES AND IT'S IMMINENT DANGER TO THE ECOSYSTEM .

The environmental impact of Israeli air strikes can be devastating and long-lasting. The destruction of buildings, infrastructure, and natural resources can lead to increased pollution, displacement of wildlife, and degradation of ecosystems.

For example, air strikes that target power plants and oil refineries can cause massive oil spills and toxic emissions that contaminate water and soil. Explosions and fires can also release harmful chemicals and particulate matter into the air, posing serious health risks to humans and wildlife.

In addition, the displacement of people and destruction of homes and communities can lead to increased waste and pollution as people struggle to meet their basic needs

Here are a few more facts about the environmental impact of Israeli air strikes:
The destruction of forests and agricultural land can cause soil erosion, loss of biodiversity, and reduction of carbon sequestration.

Air strikes can disrupt critical water systems, contaminating water sources and causing shortages of drinking water and water for agriculture.

The use of explosive weapons in populated areas can cause heavy metals and toxic chemicals to be released into the environment, causing long-term health problems for local communities.

The use of incendiary weapons can start wildfires that can spread quickly and cause widespread damage to ecosystems.

Furthermore , these are a few more facts about the environmental impact of Israeli air strikes:

Air strikes can cause the displacement of wildlife, forcing animals to flee their habitats and potentially leading to extinction of certain species.

The destruction of infrastructure and natural resources can disrupt the local economy, leading to poverty and food insecurity.

Air strikes can cause psychological trauma to local communities, leading to increased mental health problems and making it more difficult for people to cope with environmental challenges.

The use of depleted uranium weapons can leave behind radioactive debris that can contaminate soil and water for decades.

The environmental consequences of air strikes can be extensive and far-reaching. Let's consider the following negative impact that air strikes can have on the environment:

Pollution: Air strikes can release harmful chemicals and particulate matter into the air, leading to air pollution and respiratory problems for humans and wildlife.

Climate change: The destruction of trees and other vegetation can release large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change.

Ecosystem destruction: Air strikes can destroy habitats, kill wildlife, and cause soil erosion and loss of biodiversity.

Water contamination: Air strikes can contaminate water sources with toxic chemicals, oil spills, and other pollutants, leading to shortages of clean drinking water.

Food insecurity: The destruction of agricultural land and food supplies can cause food insecurity and malnutrition, especially in areas already struggling with poverty and hunger.

Long-term health effects: The release of toxic chemicals and radioactive materials can cause long-term health problems for local communities, including cancer, birth defects, and neurological disorders.

Economic disruption: Air strikes can disrupt local economies and livelihoods, leading to poverty and increased inequality.

Cultural loss: The destruction of cultural heritage sites and communities can erase important landmarks and traditions, leading to a loss of identity and cultural heritage.

Psychological trauma: The stress and trauma of living in a conflict zone can have long-term psychological effects, making it more difficult for people to cope with environmental challenges.

Destruction of infrastructure: Air strikes can destroy important infrastructure, such as hospitals, schools, and power plants, making it more difficult for communities to recover and rebuild after the conflict ends.

Refugee crises: Large numbers of people may be displaced by air strikes, leading to overcrowding in refugee camps and increased pressure on local resources.

Long-term contamination: The lingering effects of air strikes, such as the presence of unexploded ordnance and chemical contamination, can pose a threat to human and environmental health for decades after the conflict ends.

The lingering effects of air strikes can be devastating for both people and the environment.

Unexploded ordnance, such as bombs and landmines, can remain buried in the ground for years after the conflict ends, posing a serious threat to human safety. If these explosives are accidentally triggered, they can cause injury or death.

Chemical contamination can also have long-lasting effects. For example, if toxic chemicals are released into the soil or groundwater, they can persist in the environment for years or even decades, leading to chronic health problems and increased risk of cancer.

In addition to the physical dangers of unexploded ordnance and chemical contamination, air strikes can also have significant psychological impacts on affected communities. For example, survivors of air strikes may suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other mental health conditions, which can make it difficult for them to cope with the aftermath of the conflict.

Moreover, the destruction of infrastructure and ecosystems can have ripple effects on the local economy and environment. For example, the loss of agricultural land can lead to food insecurity, while the displacement of wildlife can disrupt the delicate balance of the ecosystem.

Another important aspect of the lingering effects of air strikes is the potential for long-term political instability. The destruction and displacement caused by air strikes can lead to resentment and grievances among affected communities, which can in turn fuel further conflict and instability.

Moreover, the cleanup and restoration of damaged areas can be a lengthy and costly process, requiring significant resources and expertise. This can strain already limited resources and hamper efforts to rebuild and recover from the conflict.

Overall, air strikes can have devastating and long-lasting impacts on both human and environmental health, highlighting the urgent need for peaceful and sustainable solutions to conflict.

A *zero-waste* approach can & will help address the climate and biodiversity crises, put a stop to pollution, and improve well-being for everyone, everywhere.

IF WE CARE ENOUGH FOR THE ENVIRONMENT WE WOULD LEAD A LIFESTYLE THAT WILL ENSURE THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE UNIVERSE.

Send a message to learn more

Students Encouraged to Champion Environmental Transformation as NGO Launches Environmental Club in Government College, Ughelli.

An Environmental Based Non Governmental Organization known as Clean Ecosystem Foundation has today charged the students of Government College, Ughelli to become environmental transformational agents .

Addressing the already eager waiting students,the Director of Communication and advocacy Comrade Timothy Ogheneovo Emorhakpor noted that it has become imperative for young people to be involved in the fight against environmental degradation so that as they grow up , they will never depart from it .

The phrase "catch them young" is often used to emphasize the importance of instilling good values, skills, and habits in children and young people while they are still impressionable.

Comrade Emorhakpor highlighted some reasons why children became the target audience in this project to include the following, Children's brains are more plastic and adaptable, so they are more receptive to learning new things ,teaching children and young people early can help prevent bad habits from forming ,early experiences and education can have a lasting impact on a person's development ,children and young people can be more open to change and new ideas than adults

The Director of Communication and advocacy noted that there are several benefits to establishing an environmental club, including:
Educating members and the community about environmental issues, promoting sustainable practices such as recycling and energy conservation, raising awareness of the importance of protecting the environment,
encouraging members to volunteer in environmental projects,building a sense of community and camaraderie among members
as well as providing networking opportunities for members with similar interests to mention but a few .

I am sure you may be wondering why would children become environmental change agents, Comrade Emorhakpor asked , the answers are not far fetched he continued .

You people are the future, so it's important to teach you about environmental issues and how you can help make a positive impact.
At your level ,you are often more open to learning about the environment and are more likely to adopt eco-friendly habits than your parents , you can influence your parents and other adults to become more environmentally conscious ,you can also be powerful advocates for environmental causes and can raise awareness among their peers as well as be more creative and innovative in your approach to solving environmental problems.

The highlight of the program was the sharing of branded notebooks to the newly established Environmental change Agents ( environmental club) .

Receiving the team in his office earlier,the Principal of Government College, Ughelli Mr Obor Samson eulogized the NGO for taking this bold steps to establishing environmental change agents ( environmental clubs ) in secondary schools in Delta State adding that the project is laudable and worth emulating the Principal noted .

PHOTO NEWS: Delegation from Clean Ecosystem Foundation Makes Courtesy Call on Delta State Environment Commissioner, Hon. Jamani Ejiroghene Tommy, in Asaba Today.