PLY analytics
PLY analytics offers data-driven analytics solutions that empower better decision-making across investment, business, and financial domains.
🥛 Pieno žvaigždės Outperformed Vilvi/Vilkyškių Group in Profitability in Q1 2026
📈 Pieno žvaigždės
🔹 Revenue remained stable, but a 10% decline in cost of sales lifted gross margin to 27%. Gross profit jumped 43% YoY.
🔹 Net profit reached €3.1M, up from just €0.2M a year ago. The result also slightly exceeded the company's previous Q1 record of €2.8M, set in 2023.
🔹 One negative: operating expenses increased 18% YoY.
📉 Vilvi Group
🔹 Revenue increased 22% YoY, largely due to the consolidation of the canned milk business.
🔹 Gross margin declined from 10% to 6%, and on top of that, operating expenses climbed 82% YoY.
🔹 Excluding one-off gains from a bargain purchase, the quarter would have been loss-making at the net profit level.
💰 Vilvi Group continues to trade at a premium, reflecting higher growth expectations, with 11.6x P/E (23x excluding other operating income) and 16.4x EV/EBITDA, compared with 9.6x P/E and 5.9x EV/EBITDA for Pieno žvaigždės.
📊 With April raw milk prices still 28% below last year's level, all eyes are now on whether this cost advantage can be sustained through Q2 – follow PLY Markets agro statistics for the latest trends.
https://plymarkets.com/dashboard/groups/dabc12d0-2c61-4383-b024-22df7611fb0b/reports/b72395f1-efa5-4f43-aef8-c033c2ff6666
📉 Grigeo Group Q1 2026: Growth Meets Margin Pressure
Grigeo Group delivered strong top-line growth in Q1 2026, with revenue up 31% YoY to €77.5M, largely driven by acquisition effect and a 61% increase in paper segment sales. 📈
But the main challenge was margins, driven by cost of goods sold and selling and distribution expenses growing faster than revenue.
🔺 Gross profit + 8% YoY
🔻 EBITDA - 21% YoY
🔻 Operating profit - 47% YoY
Margins came under pressure across all business segments. The paper segment's gross profit growth was almost half the pace of revenue growth, while gross profit in other segments declined.
Free cash flow remained negative by high investments in long-term assets and weaker FFO this quarter.
📊 Valuation metrics moved higher: P/E increased to 9.7x and EV/EBITDA to 4.9x, although the latter remains relatively low.
The acquisition effect should continue supporting revenue growth over the next two quarters, but the key question remains: will that growth start translating into profits? 💡
👉 Follow PLY Markets and stay tuned for more updates and market insights.
https://plymarkets.com/dashboard/groups/dabc12d0-2c61-4383-b024-22df7611fb0b/reports/3b5d9a1f-e693-43d9-b0d4-4ba34b033846
🚨 Akola Group Q3 FY2025/2026: One Segment Is Carrying the Business
Akola Group’s latest quarter was weaker YoY, but not particularly concerning in a broader historical context.
📉 Revenue declined 5% (11% based on corrected data) to €358M, and food production was the only growth driver (+6%).
🐔 Poultry continues to be the key profit engine, generating nearly 50% of total gross profit while contributing only around 25% of revenue.
⚠️ In Q3 FY2025/2026, operating profit fell 27% YoY (44% based on corrected data) to €10.2M. Almost all operating profit came from food production, while farming posted losses and the partners for farmers segment delivered only minimal profit.
💶 FCF over the last 12 months improved to €59M, with this quarter’s improvement being driven mainly by working capital movements rather than FFO generation.
Valuation metrics are relatively low: P/E 5.1x and EV/EBITDA 6.2x.
But the key question: is the business becoming too reliant on a single segment to sustain overall performance?
https://plymarkets.com/dashboard/groups/dabc12d0-2c61-4383-b024-22df7611fb0b/reports/5d6f92b4-84fa-460b-bc1b-505dece083d2
Ignitis grupė Q1 2026: Top-Line Growth Didn’t Reach the Bottom Line
📈 Revenue grew strongly in Q1, rising 22% YoY to €939M.
🟢 Positive contributors: Customers & Solutions and Networks segments
🔴 Negative contributors: Green Capacities and Reserve Capacities segments
EBITDA increased 10% YoY to €175.4M, but profitability came under pressure as purchases of electricity, natural gas and other services jumped 25% YoY – especially impacting the green capacities segment.
📉 Higher depreciation expenses absorbed operating profit growth, while weaker financial results driven by negative FX impact and higher interest costs pushed net profit down 13% YoY to €73M.
Cash flow story remains unchanged — free cash flow stayed negative. 💸
👇 Click the link below to explore detailed financial data with the PLY Markets!
https://plymarkets.com/dashboard/groups/dabc12d0-2c61-4383-b024-22df7611fb0b/reports/6fcb6ea7-2039-429a-82b8-97bfe1a5da37
08/05/2026
Ką apie „Liven“ IPO mano rinkos analitikai? 🤔
Savo įžvalgomis su „Verslo žinios“ dalijosi „PLY Analytics“ bendraįkūrėjas Vitalij Šostak.
Komentare finansų analizės profesionalas pabrėžia veiklos cikliškumą bei NT vystymo bendrovių tradiciją žengti į Baltijos biržą tada, kai ciklo fazė yra stebėtinai palanki: „Arco Vara“ – 2007 m., „Merko Ehitus“ – 2008 m., „Hepsor“ – 2021 m. „Tuomet IPO įverčiai taip pat buvo įdomūs. Kokia buvo akcijų kainų dinamika po IPO, priminti turbūt neverta. Galbūt tai yra tik sutapimas. Galbūt „Liven“ atveju viskas bus visiškai kitaip. Bet apie cikliškumą verta atsiminti ir panagrinėti jį truputį detaliau“.
„Dėmesį atkreipia pelningumo rodikliai, kuriais pagrįstai giriasi „Liven“. Labai nedaug bendrovių gali pasigirti 28% ROE. Žinoma, iš dalies tai yra didelio finansinio sverto rezultatas – nuosavo kapitalo rodiklis prieš IPO sudaro tik 26%, o tai savo ruožtu yra viena priežasčių, kodėl yra organizuojamas IPO. Žinoma, bendrovė žiūri į ateitį kiek realistiškiau ir deklaruoja 20% ROE ilgalaikį tikslą“.
V. Šostak teigimu, „Liven“ grynasis pelningumas beveik du kartus viršija ilgalaikius sektoriaus vidurkius tarp bendrovių, viešai atskleidžiančių savo rodiklius. Tačiau jis pažymi, kad investuotojai turės nuspręsti, kiek tai yra realu ir tvaru ilgalaikėje perspektyvoje.
👉 Plačiau skaitykite „Verslo žinios“ straipsnyje: https://www.vz.lt/rinkos/2026/05/06/seniai-matytame-baltijos-ipo-roziniu-spalvu-tvarumas-kelia-abejoniu-584335
📉 Merko Ehitus Q1 Numbers Look Weak – But the Future May Not
The start of 2026 was clearly challenging for Merko Ehitus, especially compared to the strong Q1 last year. Even compared to earlier years, this quarter looked soft.
Key highlights:
🔻 Revenue fell to €57M (-33% YoY)
🔻 Operating profit dropped sharply to just €1.3M (-87% YoY)
Margins were under pressure as revenue declined faster than both the cost of goods (-26% YoY) sold and operating expenses (-17% YoY).
The bottom line looked somewhat better at €4.3M due to positive income tax effect, but it was still below last year’s level.
Bright spot:
🚀 The Rūdninkai military campus contract significantly boosted the outlook. During Q1, the order book jumped 77% to €826M from €467M at the end of 2025.
Could this become a future growth driver? Explore Merko Ehitus financials with PLY Markets. 🔎
https://plymarkets.com/dashboard/groups/b0690976-8205-4e4a-b29d-484bac5c0f33/reports/b3dc52e6-2e51-4a2e-943d-36d0e6c8c145
📈 Apranga Group kicks off 2026 on an upward trend
Apranga has started the year on a positive note – revenue is growing and margins remain stable (though not at peak levels).
🔹 Revenue: +9% YoY
🔹 Gross profit: +10% YoY
Operating expenses were well managed, increasing in line with revenue. However, strong seasonality in Q1 absorbed almost all of the gross profit.
💰 Net result: €443K
➡️ That’s +73% YoY, but still below Q1 2023 and Q1 2024, when results exceeded €1M.
👉 What does it mean?
The trend is positive – but the real test lies ahead. The next three quarters are the key profit drivers.
🔍 Want deeper insights?
Explore the updated PLY Markets website and dive into the data.
https://plymarkets.com/dashboard/groups/dabc12d0-2c61-4383-b024-22df7611fb0b/reports/a8498b59-c647-4b18-bf4d-86ea8dcc81cc
30/04/2026
🌟 A new chapter for PLY Analytics 🌟
Started as a platform focused on analyzing publicly traded companies in the Baltic and Nordic markets, PLY Analytics is now evolving into something much bigger. 🌍
As part of this next step, our current product PLY Analytics is being renamed to PLY Markets. 🔄
At the same time, PLY Analytics will become the umbrella brand for a broader ecosystem of products:
🔹 PLY Business
🔹 PLY Insights
🔹 PLY Markets
🔹 PLY Strategies
Together, these solutions are built for investors and businesses – enabling deeper insights and turning data into smarter, more confident decisions. 📊🚀
👉 Visit the updated PLY Analytics website to learn more about our products: https://plyanalytics.com/
Artea Q1 2026: Down, but Not the Worst 📉
Artea reported net profit of €15.4M (-13% YoY) in Q1, placing it between peers. Coop Pank delivered growth (+5% YoY), while LHV Group saw a much sharper drop (-32% YoY).
What worked ✅
• Net interest income increased (+4% YoY), though still lagging Coop Pank (+9%), while LHV Group slightly declined (-4% YoY).
• Staff costs remained stable.
• Lower impairment expenses supported the bottom line.
What didn’t ⚠️
• Non-core items weighed on comparability: €3.6M YoY lower financial asset derecognition and €1.3M YoY larger loss from trading activities.
• Other operating expenses increased by 10% YoY.
Valuation💡
• Coop Pank – lower P/E, similar P/BV, higher ROE.
• LHV Group – still at a premium, but P/E is close and the ROE gap is narrowing.
Take a closer look at Baltic banks on PLY. 🔍
https://plyanalytics.com/dashboard/groups/dabc12d0-2c61-4383-b024-22df7611fb0b/reports/45dc5e6d-28a8-468f-83bb-e4aa3e61b694
26/02/2026
Artea 2025: A Year of Decline
At the end of 2025, Artea bank showed no clear signs of recovery. While net interest income rose 6% QoQ in Q3, it returned to Q2 levels in Q4. Meanwhile, Coop Pank and LHV Group closed the year with stronger net interest income than in Q3. Overall in 2025, Artea’s net interest income declined by 14% YoY – the same decrease as LHV Group – while Coop Pank reported a smaller decline of 6% YoY.
Net profit:
🔻Artea: -23% YoY (Q4 -19%) to €60.7M
🔻LHV: -22% (Q4 -15%)
🔻Coop: -11% (with Q4 growth)
⚙️ Key challenges in 2025:
📉 Declining net interest income
📈 Rising operating costs
Artea’s other operating expenses increased by €10.8M (+28% YoY), mainly driven by IT and communication costs. Staff expenses rose by €5.6M (+11% YoY).
Lower impairment expenses supported 2025 results – particularly for Artea and LHV. However, while all three maintain strong loan loss ratios, any deterioration in credit quality would add further pressure on profitability.
📊 Market positioning: Artea doesn’t stand out
– Higher P/E than Estonian peers
– Lowest ROE
– P/BV similar to Coop Pank, lower than LHV Group – but LHV Group justifies its premium with significantly stronger ROE
Notably, Estonian banks grew their loan portfolios by around 20% in 2025, double Artea’s 8%, raising the question of whether they will overtake Artea.
https://plyanalytics.com/dashboard/groups/dabc12d0-2c61-4383-b024-22df7611fb0b/reports/45dc5e6d-28a8-468f-83bb-e4aa3e61b694
Click here to claim your Sponsored Listing.
Category
Contact the business
Website
Address
Ulonų Str. 5
Vilnius
08240