GlobalSpeed

1992 KTM 250 SX vs 1992 Kawasaki KX250

European Aggression vs Japanese Precision

The early 1990s produced some of the toughest 250cc two-stroke motocross machines ever built. In this showdown, the 1992 KTM 250 SX takes on the 1992 Kawasaki KX250—two bikes with completely different personalities but the same goal: winning races.

ENGINE & PERFORMANCE

1992 KTM 250 SX

- Engine: 249cc liquid-cooled 2-stroke single
- Bore x Stroke: 69.5 mm × 64.0 mm
- Horsepower: Approx. 49 hp @ 8,500 rpm
- Powerband: Strong mid-to-top pull with an aggressive hit
- Carburetor: Dell'Orto 38 mm
- Transmission: 5-speed

1992 Kawasaki KX250

- Engine: 249cc liquid-cooled 2-stroke single
- Bore x Stroke: 69.0 mm × 66.0 mm
- Horsepower: Approx. 47 hp @ 8,000 rpm
- Powerband: Broad low-to-mid torque with smoother delivery
- Carburetor: Keihin PWK 38 mm
- Transmission: 5-speed

GEAR RATIOS

KTM 250 SX

- 1st: 2.00
- 2nd: 1.53
- 3rd: 1.25
- 4th: 1.04
- 5th: 0.88

KX250

- 1st: 1.92
- 2nd: 1.50
- 3rd: 1.25
- 4th: 1.04
- 5th: 0.88

CHASSIS & DIMENSIONS

KTM 250 SX

- Rake: 27.5°
- Wheelbase: 1,490 mm
- Dry Weight: 99 kg (218 lbs)
- Front Suspension: WP USD Fork
- Rear Suspension: WP Monoshock

Kawasaki KX250

- Rake: 27.0°
- Wheelbase: 1,480 mm
- Dry Weight: 96 kg (212 lbs)
- Front Suspension: Kayaba Conventional Fork
- Rear Suspension: Uni-Trak

ON THE TRACK

Cornering
The KX250 feels lighter and more predictable entering turns. Its smoother power delivery lets riders carry speed through ruts and tight corners with less effort.

Straight-Line Speed
The KTM fights back with a harder mid-range hit and stronger top-end charge. On long straights and rough outdoor tracks, the Austrian machine feels fast and exciting.

Jump Faces
The KX stays balanced and neutral, while the KTM demands a more aggressive riding style but rewards experienced riders with explosive acceleration.

Rough Terrain
WP suspension on the KTM handles big hits well, but the KX offers a more planted and forgiving feel over an entire moto.

FINAL VERDICT

The 1992 Kawasaki KX250 was the easier bike to ride fast. It cornered better, felt lighter, and delivered power more smoothly.

The 1992 KTM 250 SX was the wild card. More aggressive, harder-hitting, and packed with European character, it rewarded riders who weren't afraid to attack the track.

Thirty-plus years later, both remain icons of the golden age of 250 two-strokes.

Which one are you choosing for a full moto: the Austrian KTM or the Green Machine?

1992 KTM 250 EXC vs 1992 KTM 250 SX — Enduro Warrior or Motocross Fighter?

Same engine size. Same Austrian roots. Two completely different personalities.
The 1992 KTM 250 EXC was designed to handle long rides, rough trails, and challenging terrain. Smooth power delivery and versatile gearing made it a favorite for riders who wanted to go anywhere.
The 1992 KTM 250 SX was built with racing in mind. Quicker-revving, more aggressive, and focused on pure speed, it was made to attack motocross tracks and fight for every position.
More than three decades later, riders still argue about which one was better.
If both were sitting in your garage, which one gets ridden first?
Drop your choice below and tell us why!

1991 Suzuki RM250 vs 1991 Husqvarna 250 WMX – Japanese Precision or Swedish Muscle?

Two legendary 250cc two-strokes from very different worlds. The 1991 Suzuki RM250 was known for its sharp handling, aggressive powerband, and race-proven motocross performance. On the other side, the 1991 Husqvarna 250 WMX brought European toughness, strong low-to-mid torque, and a unique riding character that stood out from the Japanese competition.
The RM250 loved being ridden hard and rewarded riders with explosive acceleration. The Husqvarna WMX offered a more planted feel, excellent traction, and a broad power delivery that worked well on rough tracks and technical terrain.
Thirty-five years later, both bikes still have loyal followers. But if you could only choose one to line up on the starting gate, which machine gets your vote?
RM250 or WMX? Tell us why in the comments!

1991 Yamaha YZ250 vs 1991 KTM 250 MX — Two-Stroke Motocross Excellence from Different Worlds

The early 1990s marked one of the most competitive eras in 250cc motocross, and few machines represented that battle better than the 1991 Yamaha YZ250 and the 1991 KTM 250 MX. Both were purpose-built racing motorcycles, but each approached performance with a distinctly different philosophy.
The Yamaha YZ250 relied on a highly refined liquid-cooled two-stroke engine that delivered approximately 45–47 horsepower at around 8,500 rpm. Its powerband was broad and predictable, making it easier for riders to maintain momentum through technical sections and challenging corners. Yamaha's suspension setup and chassis geometry provided excellent balance, contributing to the bike's reputation for stability and rider confidence.
In contrast, the KTM 250 MX produced roughly 49 horsepower at approximately 8,600 rpm, accompanied by stronger torque throughout the midrange. The Austrian machine delivered aggressive acceleration and explosive power delivery, particularly when exiting corners or attacking long straights. KTM's lightweight construction and race-focused setup appealed to experienced riders seeking maximum performance and responsiveness.
On the track, the YZ250 excelled in consistency, corner speed, and overall ease of use. The KTM 250 MX offered a more aggressive character, rewarding skilled riders with impressive straight-line speed and stronger midrange punch. Both machines remain icons of the golden era of two-stroke motocross and continue to be highly respected among vintage racing enthusiasts today.
Which one would be in your garage: the smooth and balanced YZ250 or the hard-hitting KTM 250 MX?

1991 KAWASAKI KX250 vs 1991 SUZUKI RM250

Two-Stroke Heavyweights of the Early '90s

Back in 1991, the 250cc motocross class was packed with serious competition, and two of the biggest names were the Kawasaki KX250 and Suzuki RM250. Both machines delivered explosive two-stroke power, but each had a very different personality on the track.

1991 Kawasaki KX250

Engine: 249cc liquid-cooled 2-stroke single
Bore x Stroke: 66.4 mm × 72.0 mm
Horsepower: Approximately 47 hp @ 8,500 rpm
Power Band: Strong mid-range with excellent top-end pull
Transmission: 5-speed

Gear Ratios:
1st: 2.000
2nd: 1.533
3rd: 1.235
4th: 1.000
5th: 0.826

Rake: 27.5°
Wheelbase: 58.7 in (1491 mm)
Dry Weight: 211 lb (96 kg)

1991 Suzuki RM250

Engine: 249cc liquid-cooled 2-stroke single
Bore x Stroke: 66.4 mm × 72.0 mm
Horsepower: Approximately 46 hp @ 8,250 rpm
Power Band: Aggressive low-to-mid punch with quick throttle response
Transmission: 5-speed

Gear Ratios:
1st: 2.071
2nd: 1.647
3rd: 1.333
4th: 1.090
5th: 0.920

Rake: 27.8°
Wheelbase: 58.1 in (1476 mm)
Dry Weight: 209 lb (95 kg)

Track Comparison

Cornering:
The RM250 felt lighter and more agile entering tight corners. Its quick steering and responsive chassis made it easier to change lines and attack technical sections.

Straight-Line Speed:
The KX250 excelled when the track opened up. Its stronger mid-to-top-end power delivery and stable chassis inspired confidence through fast sections and rough terrain.

Who Wins?

If you love aggressive corner attacks and quick handling, the RM250 is hard to beat.

If you prefer high-speed stability and a harder pull on long straights, the KX250 takes the advantage.

Thirty-plus years later, these two legendary machines still spark debates among motocross fans worldwide.

Which one are you choosing for a full moto in 1991—the green machine or the yellow warrior?

1991 Yamaha WR500 vs 1991 Yamaha YZ250 — Which 2-Stroke Beast Would You Ride?

Back in 1991, Yamaha offered two very different ways to dominate the dirt. The WR500 brought massive open-class power, endless torque, and straight-line speed that could intimidate even experienced riders. The YZ250, on the other hand, delivered a lighter feel, quicker handling, and razor-sharp cornering that made it a motocross favorite.
The WR500 riders will say, "Nothing beats big-bore power."
The YZ250 crowd will answer, "Power means nothing if you can't turn."
So here's the question for the dirt bike community:
If both bikes were sitting in your garage today, which one would you choose and why?
🏁 WR500 for raw power?
🏁 YZ250 for agility and control?
Drop your choice in the comments and defend your bike!

1983 Honda ATC 70 — The Little Three-Wheeler That Started It All

The 1983 Honda ATC 70 may not have been the fastest machine on the trail, but for many riders it was their first taste of off-road freedom. Lightweight, simple, reliable, and nearly indestructible, this small three-wheeler introduced an entire generation to powersports.
Some riders say the ATC 70 is the most important youth off-road machine Honda ever built. Others argue bigger ATCs like the 185S, 200X, or 250R deserve that title.
What do you think? Was the 1983 ATC 70 the ultimate beginner machine, or was there a better Honda three-wheeler?
👇 Drop your opinion in the comments and let's hear from the ATC community.

1991 Motocross Battle: Honda CR250R vs Kawasaki KX250 — Which One Ruled the Dirt?

Two legends from the golden age of 2-stroke motocross. The 1991 Honda CR250R was known for its explosive power, razor-sharp handling, and aggressive race-ready feel. The 1991 Kawasaki KX250 answered with strong low-end torque, excellent stability, and a smooth powerband that made it a favorite for many riders.
If both bikes rolled onto the starting gate today in completely stock condition, which one would you choose? The CR250R's hard-hitting power or the KX250's balanced and controllable performance?
Drop your choice in the comments and tell us why. Riders, mechanics, and longtime fans—this is your chance to settle the debate!

🏁 1990 HONDA CR250R vs 1990 SUZUKI RM250 🏁

TWO-STROKE TITANS OF THE GOLDEN ERA

The 1990 motocross season delivered two of the most respected 250cc two-strokes ever built. Honda's CR250R was known for explosive mid-to-top-end power and razor-sharp handling, while Suzuki's RM250 earned a reputation for strong low-end torque and a more forgiving ride on rough tracks.

🔧 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Honda CR250R
• Engine: 249cc liquid-cooled 2-stroke single
• Bore x Stroke: 66.4 mm × 72.0 mm
• Horsepower: Approx. 47 hp @ 8,500 rpm
• Powerband: Strong mid-range to top-end hit
• Transmission: 5-speed
• Rake: 27.5°
• Wheelbase: 58.3 in (1481 mm)
• Dry Weight: 211 lb (96 kg)

Suzuki RM250
• Engine: 249cc liquid-cooled 2-stroke single
• Bore x Stroke: 66.4 mm × 72.0 mm
• Horsepower: Approx. 45 hp @ 8,000 rpm
• Powerband: Broad low-to-mid range torque
• Transmission: 5-speed
• Rake: 28.0°
• Wheelbase: 58.7 in (1491 mm)
• Dry Weight: 216 lb (98 kg)

⚙️ TRANSMISSION CHARACTER

CR250R
1st 2.000
2nd 1.529
3rd 1.235
4th 1.000
5th 0.869

RM250
1st 2.000
2nd 1.562
3rd 1.250
4th 1.000
5th 0.875

🏆 ON THE TRACK

Cornering:
The CR250R feels lighter, turns quicker, and rewards aggressive riders who attack corners. The front end stays planted and precise.

Straight-Line Speed:
The RM250 shines when traction is limited. Its smoother torque delivery hooks up well exiting corners and feels stable at speed.

Rider Feel:
CR250R = Sharp, aggressive, race-focused.
RM250 = Smooth, predictable, rider-friendly.

Thirty-six years later, both machines remain icons of the golden age of motocross.

Which one are you taking to the starting gate?
Honda CR250R or Suzuki RM250?
Drop your choice and tell us why!