Nadeem Saifullah Rafiq

This is so amazing, according to the Christian apologists their so called God Jesus revealed the Christian new testament bibles to Mathew, Mark, Luke and John and how they were preserved proves his divinity (Not)

And even more amazing is that in the 7th century Arabia, the Qur'an affirms a different Christian bible called the Injil in Arabic which was revealed to Prophet Jesus and you don't find any argument from the Christians in 7th century against what the Qur'an affirms.

The Qur'an 5:47 clearly affirms and commands the Christians living under Islamic rule in 7th century Arabia to judge by the laws revealed in the Bible (injil) a holy book Allah The Most High revealed to Prophet Jesus.

And then after the 7th century, the Bible (Injil) mentioned in the Qur'an disappears, which means that the only historical record we have for the Bible (Injil) which was revealed to Jesus is the Qur'an.

But there's another confusion which we must note, and that is that there are too many Christian bibles in history, some which are officially recognised by the Church which they call canon and others which they branded as Apocrypha and lost Apocrypha.

And because in Arabic they are all called Injil, so it would be incorrect to say that the Injil appeared and then disappeared.

Rather it's Christianity that cannot be trusted with true knowledge, because in some Christian sources it says that the Christians before the 15th century used to read Apocrypha bibles as well.

In history, there have been so many different Christian sects believing in different bibles that it makes it impossible to pin point how many different Christian bibles have existed in history.

The Christian apologists focus a lot on the Arabic word Injil and they try to make it out as though the Injil is a special name given to a book given to Prophet Jesus from God The Most High.

While it's not, all the Christian Bibles are called Injil in Arabic.

Now I want to ask you a logical question, you know there were a lot of Christian sects in history who followed different Bibles (Injils), so then why do you have an issue with believing that there were Christians living in 7th century Arabia who followed a different Bible (Injil) ?

Why do they stand out more to you than the rest ?

I think I know why, it's because you are finding it difficult to believe that how can there have been a Holy book revealed to Jesus, but we never heard of it and it never survived ?

I will tell you why, firstly as explained, there isn't a one specific book called the Injil in Arabic, because any Christian bible is called Injil in Arabic, so that's one of the main reasons we are not able to find it's mention in history.

And secondly it's because the Qur'an superceded the Torah and the Bible (injil), which means Allah The Most High has allowed (or caused) the Torah and the Bible (injil) to be forgotten (or distorted) after the Qur'an was revealed.

Think about it, why did Allah The Most High command the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah The Most High be upon him) to expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian peninsula ?

It's because after the Qur'an was revealed Allah The Most High only recognised Islam as the true religion, so if He The Most High had the Jews and Christians expelled from the Arabian peninsula, so it shouldn't come to us as a surprise if He The Most High allowed or caused the Torah and the Injil to be forgotten (or distorted)

I truly believe that the original Bible (injil) is in your Christian's Apocrypha bibles which you currently have, if it's not, then it's lost in history as an Apocrypha gospel.

And whichever Muslim says that there are fragments of the real Injil in the Christian new testament bibles are just assuming, because it says in the Christian sources that Mathew, Mark, Luke and John quoted verses from the old testament the Septuagint.

So how can those verses which you are assuming are fragments of the original Injil be the real Injil, if they are clearly copied from the Septuagint ?

From what we gather from reading the Qur'an, Allah The Most High did protect the Torah and the Injil until the Qur'an was revealed and also made the Torah and the Injil a witness for Prophet Muhammad's prophethood and the Qur'an.

And after the Qur'an was revealed, only the Qur'an was protected and preserved, not only in writing but also through oral memorization where thousands of Companions memorised it by heart.

Then it became hundreds of thousands of Muslims who memorised it by heart, then it became millions of Muslims who memorised it by heart world-wide, which means Allah The Most High has made it impossible for anyone to alter the Qur'an.

Just this evidence alone clearly proves that Allah The Most High is the true God who protected the Torah and the Injil.

And then after He The Most High revealed the Qur'an, He allowed the Torah and the Injil to be forgotten and only protected the Qur'an.

There's no other logical explanation for this based on the evidences that we have.

Now you Jews and Christians may ask that if Allah The Most High has allowed the original Torah and the Injil to be forgotten (or distorted) then how can you Jews and Christians who came afterwards be blamed for following a distorted scripture ?

Firstly for Allah The Most High allowing the Jewish and Christian scribes to distort the Torah and the Bible (Injil) means Allah The Most High caused these scriptures to be forgotten (or distorted) by not protecting them against distortions and it doesn't mean Allah The Most High distorted them.

It's the Jewish and Christian scribes that are guilty of distorting the words of Allah The Most High, and whoever believes in their distortions means they will also be blamed for believing in the falsehood which their scribes invented.

The Qur'an is a protected book, so Allah The Most High has made the Qur'an a witness against the distorted scriptures, so you will be blamed for leaving a protected book over the distorted one.

The Bible's Been Changed WAY More Than You Realize! Since the Books of the Bible were first written, just how much has the Bible been changed? After the New Testament was compiled, how much was it edited, twea...

David Wood has confessed to being a pe*****le and he's asking everyone to condemn him and call him a pe*****le.

He committed these s*x offences over 30 years ago, and he is saying that he knew it's pe******ia and child r**e to have s*xual in*******se with a 13 year old minor in his state in the US, but he still groomed the girl and took advantage of her.

Dave, the judge wouldn't care how much her breasts were grown or anything else, you groomed a 13 year old minor and had s*xual in*******se with her, did oral and sodomised her.

So you are a pe*****le.

Also you Salafists dawah cult who promote marrying 9 year old minors who have started puberty stage 1 and allow the father to forcefully consummate the marriage of a prebuescent daughter are also pe*****les and are far worse than David Wood.

David Wood Admits to S*x Crimes Against Children DISCLAIMER: The publisher of this video is not claiming that the parties involved are guilty of any crime. The video ...

You people need to pay attention to what this Salafist khawarij dawah cultist showbiz television sheikh with the name Assim al Haqeem is saying.

He said why not marry a minor (prebuescent girl), then he said if you had the chance why not marry a minor (prebuescent girl)

And he thinks this is something funny.

And he says he has 13 daughters.

We don't give a crap about how many daughters you have or don't have, you are a pe*****le, and you are publicly promoting pe******ia and r**e of children in the media.

So many pe*****les will see this video and they will think pe******ia is okay.

In regards to you slandering the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah The Most High be upon him) with your pe******ia beliefs and saying that the Prophet followed the disbeliever's customs and married a minor girl who played with dolls.

We have already debunked those Hadiths based on clear contradictions and clear evidence of fabrications, so you and your Salafist khawarij Scholars being pe*****les can say what you like, you are only proving yourselves to be pe*****les.

And you are there calling your Salafist khawarij religion a beautiful religion while it allows forced marriages and r**e of children who haven't had puberty.

And then you use some disbelievers as an example to justify your pe******ia beliefs in Islam, so for you to imitate those disbelievers then you are one of them and worse Insha'Allah.

Why did Prophet ﷺ marry a minor? #islam #islamic #quran #allah #hijab #halal #haram assim al hakeem Instagram: https://instagram.com/assimalhakeemFollow the assimalhakeem channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaD3QCpJ3jv0I9XJwf1lWebsite: htt...

Pakistan's famous actress Veena Malik's showdown with a Pakistani showbiz television sheikh with the name M***i Qavi.

That M***i Qavi is a hypocrite, he's been seen publicily making indecent videos with other women from the Pakistani media.

i.e. the modern Muslims the followers of television sheikhs and showbiz television(satellite, cable, hollywood, bollywood, lollywood, arabwood, dollywood, actors, actresses, musicians, singers, dancers, the people of unlawful seductive fashion and unlawful seductive lifestyle)

Veena Malik vs M***i Qavi • © 2011 Express News TV (Pakistan) A 'one bullet' question! You have to take out Pamela Anderson or the relatively unpopular Veena Malik. Who would you kill? Seriously, which red-blooded male ...

It looks like this Salafist (Wahabi) Dr Zakir Naik has been drinking too much of that camels urine which he keeps telling everyone that it's some special type of pure and organic urine.

What the hell, why are you reading the Christian bibles and giving them your own interpretation ?

Does it say anywhere in Islam that the Christian new testament bibles is the Injil revealed to Mathew, Mark, Luke and John ?

These verses are not revealed by Allah The Most High, so why are you lying against Allah The Most High and saying Almighty God revealed this ?

Also in one video this hypocrite says Mother Aisha had gone through puberty after she reached 9 years old and in another he says she was a child at 9 years old so she was allowed to play with dolls.

The guy is full of contradictions just like the rest of the Salafist dawah cult and a confirmed hypocrite, that's why he promotes all types of filth in Islam and slanders Islam with falsehood in the media while thinking what he's doing is correct.

This is called being a blinded hypocrite whom Allah The Most High has sent astray.

Now in regards to this verse ' in the beginning was the word' , I swear to you by Allah The Most High that the Christian new testament bibles are not a revelation from Allah The Most High.

Whoever believes that Allah The Most High has revealed the Christian new testament bibles to Mathew, Mark, Luke and John or quotes from them as though they are a revelation from Allah The Most High then he is a disbeliever in Islam.

We have already given evidence of the Salafist dawah cult's hypocrisy, they are confirmed hypocrite disbelievers, it's because they make halal what is haram in Islam.

That's why they keep getting destroyed by the Christian apologists and bring embarrassment to Islam in the media.

He has no evidence for anything he says about the Christian new testament bibles, he is a very confused individual who keeps misleading people with falsehood.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God? Dr. Zakir Naik In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God? Dr. Zakir Naik*In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and ...

Watch how Dr Zakir Naik dodges to explain one of the verses linked to the Islamic dilemma debate i.e. the Qur'an 5:68

And he takes the Christian professor around in circles in order to dodge the question and he says don't just read one verse.

Really, so why do you keep asking the Christians to produce one verse in which Jesus said he is God and worship him while ignoring all the verses which say Jesus has a human nature and a so called God nature ?

And he keeps telling the Christians that the Christian new testament bibles are distorted, but at the same time he says if Jesus has said in the Christian new testament bibles that he is God and worship him, then he is willing to accept Jesus as God and believe in the distorted Christian bibles.

See Dr Zakir Naik's hypocrisy, this is why he is one of the biggest currupters in Islam, he's a hypocrite who doesn't know he's a hypocrite because he is a blinded hypocrite.

He promotes showbiz television, oral s*xual in*******se, eating s*xual fluids, husband and wife ma********ng through video call, drinking camels urine, su***de attacks, and he promotes pe******ia by covering up for his Salafist Scholars who have unanimously agreed that it's allowed in Salafism to marry prebuescent girls (pe******ia)

Do you see the difference between our beliefs and the Salafist dawah cult beliefs ?

Also the Christian new testament bibles are not the Injil mentioned in the Qur'an, which means the Muslims are not allowed to give the Christian new testament bibles their own interpretation.

The Christian scholars have clearly said that according to their interpretation of the Christian new testament bibles, Jesus has a human nature and a so called God nature.

So unless you believe the Christian new testament is the Injil revealed to Mathew, Mark, Luke and John, otherwise you have no right to give the Christian new testament bibles your own interpretation.

He obviously only does this to attract attention in the media just like the rest of the Salafist dawah cult hypocrites.

But when the Christian apologists start giving their own interpretation to the Qur'an and Hadith and start picking out contradictions, then the Salafist dawah cult start crying Islamophobia, Islamophobia, missionary, missionary.

And they start lying against the Qur'an saying general confirmation, general confirmation.

May Allah The Most High curse the hypocrites who mix the truth with falsehood and lie against the Qur'an by believing in the Christian new testament bibles history.

Dr Zakir Naik is viewing this post, and we challenged him many times before to explain the meaning of the Qur'an 65:4 and the Qur'an 5:43-47

But he keeps hiding like the cursed satan's Salafist donkey that he is, he knows the Christian apologists have put the Salafist dawah cult in the Islamic dilemma and they keep going round and round in circles.

It's because they keep quoting the Christian new testament bibles in the media and they give the Christian new testament their own Salafist dawah cult interpretation, so now they don't know what to do, because anything they say creates contradictions and a dilemma.

If the Christian new testament bibles are not the Injil, then the Salafist dawah cult are stuck in the dilemma because they keep quoting from it by believing in it and giving it their own interpretation.

And if they say the Christian new testament bibles is the Injil then they are stuck again because that would mean the Qur'an is affirming a book which contradicts the Qur'an and it's written by anonymous authors (Mathew, Mark, Luke and John)

So they decided to fabricate a lie and said it's a general confirmation, which creates another dilemma because why would Allah The Most High confirm any books in general which He The Most High did not reveal to Mathew, Mark, Luke and John ?

Dr. Zakir Naik Gets DESTROYED In Debate With Christian Professor Is the Bible really corrupted or is that just a myth? This video dives into a calm but powerful Christian response to Dr. Zakir Naik’s claims. Backed by anci...

David Wood and the rest of the Christian apologists, we want you to use reason in what we mention to you in this post and then judge.

If you notice, you Christian apologists or the Salafist dawah cult don't stand a chance infront of us because we follow the correct Islam.

If you notice, the Salafist dawah cult get destroyed in the media by the Christian apologists, have you ever wondered why that is ?

It's because of their hypocrisy Allah The Most High doesn't give them victory.

There's not a single Christian apologist that can defeat us on Islam, and this is a fact.

It's because we read the Qur'an and Hadith with the correct meaning.

Dave you know enough about Islam, so ask yourself this Question, Allah The Most High said in the Qur'an that if the Qur'an was from someone other than Allah then you will find in it many contradictions.

Now ask yourself, have you seen how many contradictions are in Salafist dawah cult's teachings about Islam, they blind follow anything their Scholars say and they try to justify contradictions.

This means Salafism is a lie and it's not from Allah The Most High.

But if you notice, you won't find any contradictions in what we tell you about Islam, Alhamdulillah.

Any Hadith that contradicts the Qur'an or it contradicts other Sahih Hadiths which align with the teachings of the Qur'an, we don't believe in those Hadiths.

Because if we believed in those Hadiths then that means we are contradicting what Allah The Most High revealed and said if the Qur'an was from someone other than Allah then you will find in it many contradictions.

So remember if there are contradictions in Hadith then those Hadiths are not Sahih even though they have a Sahih chain.

So you Christian apologists will defeat the Salafist dawah cult hypocrites because they are cursed liars, who exaggerate about Islam and blind follow contradictions.

But you don't stand a chance against us and you know it Dave, but if you notice we are very different to the Salafist dawah cult in a lot of ways, we don't go around giving your Christian bible verses our own interpretation.

Because it's wrong to do that, you can't go around giving your own meanings to other religions scriptures when their Scholars have a different interpretation.

If I debated about your Christian bibles, I would only use the interpretation you use for your bibles and tell you our beliefs from the Qur'an.

But the Salafist dawah cult hypocrites take it to another level by giving their own home made interpretation to the Christian bibles.

And when the Christians apologists do the same by giving their own interpretations to the Qur'an and Hadith in the media, Salafists like Dr Zakir Naik and others start hiding because they have no answer for the contradictions.

David Wood should buy the Salafist dawah cult some dolls to play with because I'm quite surprised at the way the Christian apologists have destroyed the Salafist dawah cult.

You all know we didn't just destroy the Salafist dawah cult, we put them where they belong.

Did you know for the Salafist dawah cult to even lose on a few topics of Islam it debunks their beliefs, because they are not suppose to lose on anything because Islam is the true religion.

Prophet Muhammad is the true Messiah (honored messenger) peace and blessings of Allah The Most High be upon him.

So if the Salafist dawah cult lose even on a few topic, it takes the only true religion title away from Islam.

In regards to this video, here you will see so many examples of the contradictions found in Hisham ibn Urwa's Hadith about the marital age of mother Aisha, which he remembered to narrate after he reached 71 years old and had moved cities.

Think about it, why would someone wait till they are 71 years old to narrate a Hadith, just that alone proves that he had fabricated it.

But the Salafist dawah cult think like pe*****les so they believe in anything their Scholars tell them, even if it means eating s*xual fluids, and drinking camels urine and promoting pe******ia in Islam.

Here are some more examples, the following is copied and pasted:

The Quran was written during the time of Prophet Muhammad and its 100% authentic. Nowhere in The Quran is it mentioned about the Prophet’s marriage. But its mentioned in the Hadiths.

Hadiths are authentic but not held in a level of authenticity as the Quran does. Hadiths were written over 200 years after the death of Prophet Muhammad.

Let us study this issue through the hadiths and historical evidence. The Prophet married Aisha 1 year after Hijrah. This is a known fact. Hijrah is when the Prophet migrated from Makkah to Medina. The Islamic calendar begins from Hijrah.

According to Sahih Bukhari (which is the most authentic of hadiths), Aisha (also spelt as Ayesha) is reported to have said that at the time Surah Al-Qamar, the 54th Chapter of the Quran, was revealed, “I was a young girl”. The 54th surah Al-Qamar of The Quran was revealed nine years before Hijrah. So Aisha was a young girl (jariyah), and not an infant (sibyah) at that time. The Prophet married Aisha one year after Hijrah. Let say for example she was 7 years old when she said “I was a young girl”, then she married the Prophet 10 years after that. Which means she was over 17 years old when the Prophet married her.

According to a number of narratives, Aisha accompanied the Muslims in the Battle of Badr and Uhud. It was usual for women to accompany men in battle so they can help in looking after the wounded. It was a strict rule that no one under the age of 15 was allowed to accompany anyone in battle. The Battle of badr was 2 years after hijrah and battle of uhud was 3 years after hijrah. Remember Prophet Muhammad married her 1 year after hijrah. Which means she could never have been 9 years old when the Prophet married her. This proves she was over 14 years old when she married the Prophet.

It is a known fact that the Asma, (the elder sister of Aisha) was 10 years older than Aisha. It is reported that Asma died 73 years after Hijrah when she was 100 years old. Now, if Asma was 100 years old 73 years after Hijrah, then Asma should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of Hijrah. If Asma was 27 or 28 years old at Hijrah, then Aisha would be 17 or 18 years old at Hijrah. The Prophet Muhammad married Aisha 1 year after hijrah. So that means Aisha was 18 or 19 years old when she got married.

Tabari in his treatise on Islamic history, while mentioning Abu Bakr (father of Aisha) reports that Abu Bakr had four children and all four were born during pre Islamic period. If Aisha was born before in the Pre Islamic period, then she would be more than 13 years old during Hijrah. Remember the Prophet married her 1 year after hijrah, which means she would be more that 14 years old during the time of marriage.

We know Aisha accepted Islam quite some time before Umar ibn Khattab. Umar ibn Khattab accepted Islam roughly 7 years before Hijrah. Obviously, she would have been a young girl when she accepted Islam. If you add 7 years to a young girl. You can think for yourselves. Remember the Prophet married her 1 year after hijrah.

According to Ibn Hajar, Fathima (daughter of Prophet) was 5 years older than Aisha. Fathima was born more than 5 years before Muhammad was a Prophet. That means Fathima was born more than 18 years before Hijrah. Prophet married Aisha one year after hijrah. So this again proves Aisha was over 14 years old when the Prophet married her.

We know that the Fathima (daughter of Prophet Muhammad) got married at the age of 20. Other women also got married at roughly that age. It’s a bit odd to say suddenly you find an exception like a 9 year old getting married.

All this evidence shows that Aisha was not 9 years old when the Prophet married her.

But where does it say she was 9 years old?

The narratives saying Aisha was 9 years old at the time of marriage, are reported by only one source named Hisham ibn Urwah reporting from what he heard from his father. If Hisham ibn Urwah was right then others would have also reported but Hisham ibn Urwah is the only person to report this. Hisham ibn Urwah lived in Medinah but its very fishy because there were so many others in Medinah including the Jews. Even the Jews did not report any such thing. If Prophet had married a 9 year old, obviously the Jews would have reported it on their own sources.

Hisham ibn Urwah moved to Iraq later and these narratives come from Iraq. Hisham moved to Iraq when he was 71 years old. All the narratives saying Prophet Muhammad married a 9 year old have been reported after he started living in Iraq far away from Madinah.

Only Hisham ibn Urwah says Aisha was 9 years old. There is no other hadith saying such things.

What do others say about Hisham ibn Urwah?

Tehzibu’l-tehzib, was a man who was one of the most well known people on the life and reliability of the narratives of the traditions of the Prophet. What did he have to say about Hisham ibn Urwah’s narrations?

According to Yaqub ibn Shaibah he said: “narratives reported by Hisham which are reported through the people of Iraq are unreliable. Because the people of Iraq were under the influence of the rebels..

It further states that Malik ibn Anas objected on those narratives of Hisham ibn Urwah that were reported through people of Iraq (Volume 11, page 48–51)

Mizanu’l-ai ‘tidal, another person on the narrators of the traditions of the Prophet reports that Hisham ibn Urwah’s memory suffered quite badly when he was old. (Volume 4, page 301–302)

It is a proven fact that Aisha was not 9 years old when she married the Prophet. But people ignore the many evidences saying Aisha was over 15 years old when she married. But they only take the narrative of Hisham ibn Urwah and start slandering the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him.

Isnad cm Matn Analysis Practicum with Dr. Joshua Little Practical on how to use the Isnād-cum-matn analysis (ICMA) associated with the following Bottled Petrichor episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P83dlFSgS...

As you can see the Salafist dawah cult with their hypocrisy and disbelief keep quoting the Christian Scholars commentaries of the Christian new testament bible verses to justify what the Qur'an is affirming.

We hope you all understand what we are saying here ?

Basically the Salafist dawah cult are using the tu quoque fallacy where you say, oh look your Christian scholars are saying your bibles affirm the other bibles in general even though they contain contradictions, so that's how the Qur'an is affirming the Christian bibles in general.

While you can't use the tu quoque fallacy in this case because that would be a clear contradiction, because you are claiming that the Qur'an is the only truth without contradictions and the Christian bibles are falsehood full of contradictions.

You can only use the tu quoque fallacy against the Christian bibles if for example the Christians said the Qur'an is wrong for teaching slavery is permitted, then you can say well you have no room to talk because your bibles also teach slavery is permitted.

But in this case where the Qur'an is claiming that the Christian new testament bibles are false, then it would be a contradiction if the Qur'an used the Christian new testament bibles to justify what the Qur'an is teaching.

It would be a clear contradiction to say that the Christian new testament bibles are false and contradictory and then at the same time take credit for it's teachings or take credit from it's teachings.

So if there are contradictions in the Christian bibles, then that won't justify the Qur'an to contain contradictions, if they both contain contradictions then that would mean both are false.

You are dealing with contradictions here, so this is why we say that you can't use the tu quoque fallacy in this case because it would mean both books contain contradictions and both are false.

It's similar to example, if someone called me a liar and proved my lies and I said to him you are a liar also and proved his lies, that just means we are both liars, this is exactly what you Salafist dawah cult are doing by using the tu quoque fallacy.

The Salafists don't see this, they believe in the Christian new testament bibles history and they believe that the Christians in 7th century Arabia were reading the Christian new testament bibles.

So that's why they keep going around in circles saying the Quran's confirmation of the Christian bibles is a general confirmation (they have invented this to get out of this Islamic dilemma)

While even to say that the Qur'an is affirming the Christian bibles in general is still a dilemma because the Christian bibles totally contradict the Qur'an, there's nothing for the Qur'an to affirm in general from the Christian new testament bibles.

There's not even any law revealed in the Christian new testament bibles to judge by.

The Salafists dawah cult blind follow what Muqatil ibn Sulaiman said in his commentary on the Qur'an 5:47 and they say Allah The Most High is telling the Christians to pardon all the criminals.

While that would be another dilemma, because then the Qur'an would be going against it's own laws and telling the Christians to pardon all the criminals.

Also how sure are you that someone who came centuries later didn't moderate Muqatil ibn Sulaiman's commentary ?

Also Muqatil ibn Sulaiman is a controversial Scholar of Islam, he has been refuted by many scholars of his time for his teachings.

So according to Muqatil ibn Sulaiman's commentary of the Qur'an 5:43-48, the Jews must stone the adulterer and the Muslims must stone the adulterer but the Christians should forgive the adulterer because Jesus said so in the Christian new testament.

What drugs have you Salafist dawah cult been taking ?

There's not one Islamic scholar or a Christian Scholar who will say to you that the Christian new testament bibles are a revelation from Allah The Most High.

So how can the Qur'an be confirming the Christian new testament bibles in general, when Allah The Most High didn't reveal them ?

So you Salafist dawah cult the clout chaser donkeys need to shut up about this general confirmation which you keep blagging in the media to get out of this Islamic dilemma.

While if you had ignored the Christian new testament bibles history and only believed in the Qur'an and read it with the correct meaning then there would be no such thing as the Islamic dilemma.

Also I wanted to add that even though the Quran's affirmation of the Torah and Injil is not general, but you can still use the general confirmation phrase for the Torah and say the Qur'an is affirming the Torah in general.

But you can't use that for the Christian new testament bibles, because the Christian new testament bibles totally contradict the Qur'an because they are not a revelation from Allah The Most High.

The Christian new testament bibles are only stories about Jesus's life on earth (peace and blessings of Allah The Most High be upon him)

Allah The Most High is clearly confirming His revelations the Torah and the Injil in the Qur'an and nothing else, not stories about Prophet Jesus's life written in the Christian new testament bibles by anonymous authors.

So it would be a clear contradiction for anyone to say that the Qur'an is affirming the Christian new testament bibles in any way shape or form because they are not a revelation from Allah The Most High.

I told you these Salafist dawah cult are nothing but the cursed satan's deluded donkeys, you will only find them to be full of contradictions, and they are confirmed liars only looking for cheap fame in the media, that's why they have been humiliated in the media by the Christian apologists.

Deen made such a big deal about this, and created so much confusion, this had to be pointed out. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.