Perth View

Dear Pope Leo XIV, spare us the lectures on walls, immigration, war, and the virtues of IsIam. The Vatican walls exist for a reason.

After Musl!m Arab raiders sacked St. Peter’s Basilica, Pope Leo IV ordered the walls to be built to protect the heart of the Church.

They were completed around 852 AD. Those walls were not built as a symbol. They were built because threats were real, security mattered, and protecting your people was necessary. So before lecturing the rest of the world, maybe remember why the Vatican itself is behind walls.

Written by Dan Clever.

🚨🇩🇰 Denmark has intensified its burqa ban, urging Muslim immigrants to follow Danish laws, cultural norms and public-space rules or consider leaving the country. The updated policy broadens restrictions on face coverings and stresses stronger integration measures. While supporters claim it promotes social cohesion and national identity, critics argue it targets minorities and limits personal freedom. The move has triggered protests across the country, with many calling the decision discriminatory, oppressive, and harmful to the Muslim community living in Denmark!.

🚨🇨🇳 In the US, they debate the death penalty for child r*pists. In China, they carry it out and announce it to the world.

China executed three men on the same day after its highest court confirmed their death sentences for severe crimes against children. The Supreme People's Court made every case public as part of what it called a zero-tolerance policy against child sexual abuse.

The first ran an illegal education center where he held dozens of children captive and assaulted at least eight girls under 14. The second posed as a talent scout online and lured nine children to meetings, including a child with a disability. The third was a repeat offender who had already served time for r*pe. After his release, he infiltrated over 20 school chatgroups, assaulted multiple girls under 14, and filmed the attacks to blackmail his victims into silence.

The court said these executions are a clear signal and announced further crackdowns on crimes against children.

Who’s gone camping lately and thought… what happened to it?

Not the idea of camping — that’s still there.
But the experience.

Pulling into what used to be a natural bush site and finding…
flattened ground
bulldozed trees
gravel everywhere
numbered bays marked out with logs like cattle pens

Less bush camp. More managed parking lot.

The shift isn’t subtle.

What used to feel like getting away from it all now feels structured, contained, and — increasingly — monetised.

Under Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA, formerly DPaW), more sites have been formalised.

Numbered. Bookable. Payable.

Order, safety, and environmental protection are the reasons given — and those matter.

But for a lot of campers, something’s been lost in the process.

Spontaneity.
Space.
That sense of finding your own quiet patch of bush.

Replaced with marked boundaries and defined sites.

Camping was never meant to feel like a caravan park without power.

Yet that’s where some places are heading.

And when you combine that with booking systems and fees, it’s not hard to see why people start asking:

Is this about managing nature —
or managing revenue?

For many West Aussies, camping isn’t just a trip.

It’s freedom.
It’s simplicity.
It’s stepping away from structure — not driving into more of it.

And when every site starts to look the same — cleared, boxed, numbered — it stops feeling like nature, and starts feeling like a system.

There’s a balance to be found.

But right now, a lot of people reckon it’s tipped too far.

Written by Perth View.

If you found this article interesting, hit Like and Share to help Perth View stay visible and keep these issues in the spotlight.

🚨 WOW.

The US launches a massive, high-risk rescue mission to recover one downed airman in Iran — involving hundreds of personnel, dozens of aircraft, and likely costing hundreds of millions of dollars.

Australia?

We’ve spent hundreds of millions on war crime investigations tied to Afghanistan — including the prosecution of one of our most decorated veterans.

Same scale of money.

Very different priorities.

One nation moves heaven and earth to bring their people home.

The other spends years and a fortune putting theirs on trial.

Let that sink in.

Written by Perth View.

The Ben Roberts-Smith Story Australia Doesn’t Want to Talk About

Three Australian soldiers lay dead in their beds.

Not in battle. Not in a firefight.
But on their own base—betrayed in the dark by a man wearing the same uniform.

Private Robert Poate.
Sapper James Martin.
Lance Corporal Rick Milosevic.

Killed in a so-called “green-on-blue” attack—an Afghan soldier who turned his weapon on the very men he was supposed to fight beside.

That’s the war people don’t want to remember.

Now fast forward.

Ben Roberts-Smith — Victoria Cross recipient, one of Australia’s most decorated soldiers — is once again in the headlines, this time arrested and facing criminal war crime charges relating to Afghanistan. 

And just like that, the narrative resets.

Hero becomes headline.
Service becomes suspicion.
War becomes courtroom.

But here’s the part that makes people stop and question everything.

The enemy Australia fought in Afghanistan did not wear uniforms in the traditional sense.

They blended in.
They switched roles.
They could be a farmer one day—and a spotter the next.

Even Australian families have said as much. The father of Private Poate himself pointed out the reality: that in Taliban-controlled regions, civilians and fighters were often indistinguishable.

That wasn’t a theory.

That was the battlefield.

⸻

So when soldiers like Roberts-Smith were sent into villages like Darwan, they weren’t stepping into clear-cut combat zones.

They were stepping into ambiguity.

Into split-second decisions.
Into environments where hesitation could get you killed.

And into a war where the enemy had already shown they would infiltrate allied forces, gain trust, and murder Australians in their sleep.

Yes—there are serious allegations.

A Federal Court judge, in a civil case, found that some allegations were proven on the “balance of probabilities.” 

But that is not a criminal conviction.

It is not “beyond reasonable doubt.”
It is not a jury verdict.
And it is not the end of the legal story.

Roberts-Smith has always maintained his innocence.

And now, finally, the matter moves into a criminal court—where the standard of proof is as high as it gets.

Here’s the uncomfortable question.

Why does it feel like Australia is relentless in pursuing its own soldiers…
while men like Hekmatullah — responsible for killing Australians through deception — walk free in Afghanistan?

Celebrated, even.

No arrest.
No trial.
No accountability.

This isn’t about saying soldiers are above the law.

They’re not.

But it is about recognising the reality of the war they were asked to fight.

A war of deception.
A war without uniforms.
A war where trust itself became a weapon.

And it raises a bigger question for Australia:

Do we fully understand the conditions we sent our soldiers into…
before we judge the decisions they made inside them?

Because once you strip away the headlines and the courtroom language, what remains is this:

A man who served his country at the highest level.
A war that was anything but conventional.
And a nation still trying to decide how to reconcile the two.

Written by Perth View.

If you found this article interesting, hit Like and Share to help Perth View stay visible and keep these issues in the spotlight.

A slap in the face 💸

With global instability rattling our economy, Aussies crushed by high prices, and a fuel crisis hitting farmers and families hard, THIS is what Labor chooses to spend your money on.

Taxpayer-funded grants exclusively for multicultural communities.

Labor is playing identity politics with your money while you struggle to fill up your car and pay your bills. Disgraceful.