Jewish Issues Watchdog

The “Settler Violence” Libel:

A 125-page analysis of the UN OCHA (Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) database on incidents in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria, which is the primary source cited by media, NGOs (like B’Tselem, Yesh Din), and international bodies for claims of widespread “settler violence" found that: only 3.8% of the total OCHA-reported incidents of "settler violence" (9 per month) are clear cases of alleged civilian-on-civilian harm (bodily injury or property damage attributed to Jewish Israelis); AND that most of those cases were of Jewish Israelis responding to Arab attacks, stone-throwing, riots, or attempts to damage property/enter communities.

In other words about 2-3 incidents per month are actually violence initiated by Jewish Israelis; while IDF/Shin Bet data documents thousands of violent Arab incidents monthly against Jews.

The report demonstrates that the “settler violence” label often refers to defensive actions (or even security force actions) as unprovoked aggression by civilians.

This "settler violence" label fuels a “blood libel” to delegitimize settlements, pressure Israel internationally, and ignore the much higher volume of Palestinian terrorist attacks.

In detail:
• Data examined: OCHA’s list of 8,332 “incidents involving Israeli settlers and other Israeli civilians” from Jan 2016 to April 2023 (pre-Oct 7 period). Of these, 6,285 were categorized as against Palestinians.
• Filtering results:
• ~2,047 (~24%) involved settlers as victims of Palestinian violence (still counted under “settler-related”).
• Many others occurred in Jerusalem (not “settlements”), involved Temple Mount visits/clashes with security forces and rioters, state infrastructure work in Area C, hiking/tourism, or non-violent events.
• Palestinian terrorists killed/wounded during attacks on Jews, or incidents with IDF/security forces (no civilian settlers involved), were often labeled “settler violence.”
• After exclusions, only ~833 incidents (~10% of the original) remained as potential cases involving Jewish civilians causing bodily harm/property damage over 7.5 years — averaging ~9 per month.
Of those remaining 10% of cases:
48% are listed simply as “involvement in clashes” — with no details on who initiated, who was the aggressor, or fault. These are ambiguous two-sided events.
• 14% explicitly involved clashes with Israeli security forces (IDF/police), meaning they were not purely civilian settler actions but confrontations during counter terrorism operations or responses.
This leaves 3.8% of the total OCHA-reported incidents of "settler violence" as clear cases of alleged civilian-on-civilian harm (bodily injury or property damage attributed to Jewish Israelis).
The report concludes that the “settler violence” label often refers to defensive actions (or even security force actions) as unprovoked aggression by civilians.

www.regavim.org

Mr. President, finish the job in Iran and free the world from this hideous regime. …Now is the time to finish them off, end their control of the Strait of Hormuz, and end their support of global terrorism.
…So far the ayatollahs have kept no promises, made no meaningful peace offers, and thumbed their noses at America and at you. It is time to finish the job, get full control of the strait, and seek peace from a position of maximum strength.

Opinion | Don’t Leave the Iran War Half-Won It is time to finish the job in Iran and seek peace from a position of maximum strength.

WSJ reports that a prospective US- Iran agreement in principle involves Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the US ending its shipping blockade.

However, giving the Iranian dictators ANYTHING for opening the Strait implies that they have the right to control the Strait.

DON’T DO IT!

Trump Says He Is in No Rush for an Iran Deal That Is Far From Finished A senior administration official said the agreement in principle would see the U.S. lift its blockade in exchange for Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump in 2018: “The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools.”

Yet, in the war with Iran, Pakistan has emerged as the principal US-Iran mediator.

However, the American Enterprise Institute describes the choice of Pakistan as “an own goal by the Trump administration” because Pakistan “is clearly on Team Iran.”

Last week, multiple Iranian aircraft were parked on a Pakistani airfield, including an Iranian air force RC-130, a reconnaissance and intelligence-gathering aircraft. Pakistan might have been shielding valuable Iranian air assets from possible strikes by the U.S. and Israel.

“I don’t trust Pakistan as far as I can throw them,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said at a Senate hearing. “If they actually do have Iranian aircraft parked in Pakistan bases to protect Iranian military assets, that tells me we should be looking maybe for somebody else to mediate.”

Considering America’s experience with Pakistan in Afghanistan, no one should be surprised that Islamabad doesn’t exactly evoke trust in Washington.

Opinion | Why Would Anyone Trust Pakistan to Mediate With Iran? We learned in the 2000s that Islamabad’s interests are in many ways the direct opposite of America’s.

From WSJ, by Dov Lieberman:

Israel launched a highly technical campaign to kill or capture all participants in the Oct. 7 attack, compiling a list of thousands of names.

Israeli intelligence uses facial recognition, intercepted calls, and location data to identify and track targets across Gaza, Lebanon and Iran.

The campaign continues despite a cease-fire, with recent strikes killing Hamas military commander Ezzedin al-Haddad.

Inside Israel’s High-Tech Campaign to Kill or Capture Every Oct. 7 Attacker One by one, militants who videotaped their exploits that day have been identified and killed, in a measure of Israel’s surveillance acumen and desire for retribution.

How to Finish the Job in Iran

From WSJ

By Seth Cropsey

President Trump faced a choice between two options last month—escalation or capitulation. He chose neither. Instead, he sought a middle road by blockading Iran’s oil capacity. He faces the same choice a month later, only now with less-favorable macroeconomics. Mr. Trump may be able to compel Iran to seek peace. But if not, this time he needs to be willing to follow through on the threat of catastrophic force. That means preparing for a multistage operation, including boots on the ground, that forcibly reopens the Strait of Hormuz to accelerate the collapse of the Iranian state.

Launching the war against Iran was strategically prudent. The regime is an inveterate enemy of the U.S. It has on its hands the blood of thousands of Americans in Iraq and elsewhere. It works closely with Russia, China, North Korea and until recently Venezuela in their efforts to undermine the U.S. It supports proxy terrorist organizations, notably Hezbollah, which destabilize the Middle East and provide Iran with direct connections to organized crime. The Islamic Republic also seeks a nuclear weapon. Since the mid-2000s, the regime has refashioned the state around the objective of building nuclear capabilities, combined with a growing arsenal of missiles and drones that it has unleashed against Israel and the Gulf states.

…Mr. Trump has a narrow window in which to end this crisis favorably, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and ensure an economic rebound while securing American interests and prestige. But that requires deploying the full spectrum of American power.

First, the U.S. should prepare a major series of strikes against Iranian communications, transportation and other infrastructure, while concurrently unleashing the Israeli air force against remaining Iranian industries. Iran’s metallurgical industry, a pillar of its state-backed economy, is badly damaged. Coordinating with Israeli attacks on these targets while disrupting Iranian military movement would cripple virtually every industry for Iran except oil production.

Two additional operations would target the Strait of Hormuz and the Iranian uranium storage in Isfahan. The former would be principally against Qeshm Island, in concert with the United Arab Emirates, which has attacked Iran many times during the war. Qeshm and its surrounding islands are the key to the strait. The latter operation should aim to seize nuclear material. By rescuing a downed pilot in early April, the U.S. demonstrated it can operate in the area effectively.

Finally, the U.S. should attack remaining Iranian tanker capacity inside the Strait of Hormuz. The faster we destroy Iran’s floating oil storage, the more the country’s economy will feel the squeeze.

Defeating Iran is paramount. On a successful outcome rests the credibility of American deterrence, the safety of international sea lanes, a return to the normalcy of global energy markets, and the regional stability that is key to all these goods. The president should finish what he rightly started.

Opinion | How to Finish the Job in Iran If the regime refuses to capitulate, Trump will have to deploy the full spectrum of U.S. power.

From The Australian, by Chris Kenny:

HOW ABC’S GAZA COVERAGE FUELLED ANTISEMITISM

Under its charter in the ABC Act our public broadcaster is charged with contributing to a “sense of national identity” and taking account of the “multicultural character of the Australian community”. Under this legal framework and the broader political context, our publicly funded broadcaster exists to support national cohesion.

In this crucial role it has failed the nation badly since October 7, 2023. On Gaza, Islamist extremism, Middle East conflicts and antisemitism the ABC has been jaundiced and deceptive, contributing to a climate that has seen the incitement of hatred against Jewish Australians.

This is an element of public debate I have drawn attention to across the past 2½ years. Thankfully, detailed evidence on these matters has been presented to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion and will have to be considered by Virginia Bell.

Four anonymous Victorians have made a 58-page submission (distilled from more than 150 pages) that provides a compelling case about the main distortions and three false narratives. The submission lays out how the ABC has pushed the “famine” hoax, the “baby killers” slur and the “genocide” claims, all buttressed by meticulously researched examples, as well as detailing how the ABC amplified Hamas propaganda.

The tone was set early. A “sentiment analysis” of reporting in the two weeks after the October 7 atrocities found “ABC headlines were 4-5 times less sympathetic to the impact on the Israeli population”.

Remember this was in the wake of 1200 obscene murders, including of women, children and the infirm, as well as rapes, defilement and hostage taking; hundreds of hostages were unaccounted for and the war against Hamas had hardly begun. This perversion of the victim versus perpetrator dynamic has only grown since.

An ABC story from March 2024 under the headline “Mothers in Gaza are watching their children slowly starve to death and are unable to stop it” demonstrates the “famine” deception. The report focuses on a harrowing personal trauma: “Two-year-old Watin al-Aswad’s body has been so badly ravaged by starvation during the Gaza war, that her bones are protruding on her skeletal frame.”

The ABC included photographs of this very sick little girl and said 27 children had starved to death according to the “Gaza Ministry of Health” – without mentioning this meant the claim had come from Hamas. Yet some of the photos showed that the girl’s mother appeared to be well nourished and healthy – would a mother feed herself while her child starved?

This is but one of hundreds of examples cited in the submission. “Even the fact that parents or other people in the photos appeared healthy did not stop the ABC from claiming that the children were starving as a result of Israel’s actions,” it said.

The submission also examines the famous (infamous) and poignant photo of one-year-old Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq, cradled by his mother. The ABC used this as a giant backdrop when Anthony Albanese was interviewed on Insiders.

“A one-year-old boy is not a Hamas fighter,” said Albanese. “That boy isn’t challenging Israel’s right to existence, and nor are the many who continue to suffer from the unavailability of food and water.” All feeding into the demonisation of Israel.

It was later revealed that the little boy suffered cerebral palsy and an uncropped version of the photograph showed his healthy and well-nourished toddler brother off to the side. How could one boy be starving and the other not?

Clearly, one was suffering from terrible illness and food supply was not the problem. The submission notes “Israeli officials have consistently refuted false claims of starvation” and argues that “repeated misrepresentation of facts has fuelled the tsunami of antisemitism in Australia”.

Similar media narratives have created ugly dynamics in other Western liberal democracies, but that does not make it any less woeful here, nor provide any excuses for the ABC.

In May 2025 the ABC ran the patently absurd claim that 14,000 babies could die of starvation in Gaza within 48 hours. While this hysterical claim was made by UN official Tom Fletcher, the ABC clearly failed to pause, think or give the claims the slightest rational consideration before amplifying them as “shocking” and a “devastating warning”.

The UN eventually disowned the claim, blaming an erroneous interpretation of risks for young children across a 12-month period (which was still alarmist and wrong). Despite official corrections by the ABC, the damage, the demonisation of Israel, was done again.

As an example of framing the Israel Defence Forces as “baby killers” the submission cites an ABC radio report where a disgruntled former humanitarian contractor claimed a young boy, “Amir”, was shot dead by soldiers. He was later found to be alive and the ABC issued a correction – but an email chain reveals that before the story ran the ABC was informed that the boy’s adoptive mother believed he was alive and had been taken into care.

The submission draws a direct link between this reporting and the rise of antisemitism. It describes reports such as this as “blood libels”.

Another focus is Gaza casualty numbers and their reporting. While upwards of 50,000 people were killed in the Gaza war, the ABC (and other media) has routinely parroted figures provided by Hamas, usually without making that source clear, and has disproportionately mentioned women and children as casualties while often ignoring terrorists or combatants.

Absent from the ABC’s coverage has been vital context from people such as international law expert, Iraq war veteran and former federal Labor frontbencher Mike Kelly about the relatively low number of civilian casualties. “If the Hamas figure of 70,000 killed is taken at face value this would mean that around half of that number would be civilian collateral casualties,” Kelly says. “That would be the best ratio of civilian deaths to combatant deaths ever achieved in the history of urban warfare.”

Then there is the ubiquitous “genocide” narrative, pushed relentlessly by the ABC even though a moment’s thought or critical analysis reveals the claim to be not only ridiculous but grotesquely so. Not only has population growth in Gaza outstripped Israel’s for decades, but Israel has ensured power, water, food and medical supplies have been available, even during the war.

In many cases, even during the war, Israel evacuated Palestinian children and others from Gaza for medical treatment. And throughout the war Israel used text messages, phone calls and leaflet drops to ensure civilians could leave areas where it was attacking Hamas.

Yet in September last year the ABC’s Middle East correspondent, Matthew Doran, reported that “the world’s leading association of genocide scholars has backed a resolution saying (Israel’s) conduct in the strip has met the legal criteria to be considered a genocide”. Missing from this report were details about the “leading association of genocide scholars”, which was the International Association of Genocide Scholars.

It turns out you can join the IAGS for $US30 with no vetting applied or academic qualifications required. Before October 7, 2023, the association had 144 members but its membership quickly ballooned to more than 500, with 15 per cent subscribing from Iraq, and some using pseudonyms such as “Adolf Hitler” and “Mo Cookie” (whose avatar was the Cookie Monster sporting a green, Hamas-style bandana).

This is the level of expertise, authority and journalistic testing that has been applied to the barbs of “genocide” repeatedly thrown at Israel. Journalists also have routinely mischaracterised what the International Court of Justice has found on this question – which is not that there are plausible claims of genocide against Israel, but that Palestinians have a plausible right to be protected from genocide.

Too often on the ABC we hear from discredited activists such as the UN’s controversial rapporteur Francesca Albanese, given free rein without critical questioning despite widespread condemnation of her work. Albanese has compared the Israeli leadership to the N***s and overestimated the Gaza death toll by a factor of 10.

“The cumulative effect of daily exposure to such framing is not public information but a form of indoctrination, normalising the perception of Israel as a pariah state and rendering suspicion or hostility toward its supporters socially acceptable,” the submission summarises.

“When extreme characterisations are normalised through daily repetition, they influence public discourse and narrow the boundaries of acceptable opinion. The result has been an environment in which Jewish Australians who openly support Israel are increasingly portrayed as perpetrators of alleged crimes against humanity. In such a climate, hostility becomes easier to justify and antisemitic sentiment more readily rationalised.

“Even if it was not the intention of the ABC, their missteps had a damaging impact on Australian social dynamics. To argue otherwise would be to negate completely the relevance of the ABC. The sheer scale of the journalistic failures and demonstrated bias – as the journalistic failures on the Gaza war always went one way, namely against Israel – contributed directly to radicalisation in society and intensified militant antisemitism across Australia.”

The logic of this argument, buttressed by the facts and the examples, is difficult to contradict. We can only hope Commissioner Bell calls the authors of this submission for evidence and gives due consideration to the media as a major driver of the climate of antisemitism.

How ABC’s Gaza coverage fuelled antisemitism Under its charter in the ABC Act our public broadcaster is charged with contributing to a “sense of national identity” and taking account of the “multicultural character of the Australian community”. Under this legal framework and the broader political context, our publicly funded broadcaste...

The longing for Zion was the most consistent thread running through Jewish civilization across every diaspora, every continent, and every language Jews ever spoke.

The Jewish tradition was smart enough to code Zionism into our daily routines and prayers, through the Crusaders who tried to baptize us by force, and through the caliphs who made us pay the jizya, the humiliation tax levied on Jews and Christians for the crime of not being Muslim. Through every empire that decided that Jewish identity was negotiable, through all of it, three times a day, after every meal, at every wedding, at the end of a year, the code activated. We remember and will never forget who we are.

Zionism is embedded in every prayer and act of Jewish life. At the end of Yom Kippur, after twenty-five hours of fasting, the holiest moment of the Jewish year, the entire congregation shouts one sentence into the silence:

L’shana haba’ah b’Yerushalayim, Next year in Jerusalem.

The Passover seder ends the same way. The morning Amidah includes a blessing facing Jerusalem.

Tisha B’Av, an entire day of national mourning for the destruction of the Temple, with specific prayers and rituals of grief, remains permanently on the Jewish calendar like an open wound that never healed.

Every mezuzah on every Jewish doorpost contains a scroll facing inward toward the land.

Even the dead were buried with a small bag of soil from Israel under their heads, so that even in death, they remained connected to the earth they never stopped belonging to.

Every Harvard freshman who has taken one Middle Eastern studies course doesn't know about the Zionist prayers and poetry from Yemen and Morocco because they are taught that Zionism began with Theodor Herzl at Basel in 1897, when European Jews started it as a colonial project.

But it’s a lie. The first organized political Zionist movement didn’t come from Vienna at all, and it didn’t start with Herzl. It came from Russia, from Jews who were being massacred in pogroms, stripped of rights by the May Laws of 1882, and who had decided to simply go home. They called themselves Hovevei Zion, the Lovers of Zion. And before a single Zionist Congress was ever convened, before Herzl had written a single word, these Russian and Romanian Jews had already built cities in the land of Israel. In 1882, a group from Kharkiv founded Rishon LeZion — the first modern Jewish city — by legally buying land from Ottoman sellers despite every bureaucratic obstacle the Turkish government could throw at them.

…These were not colonizers arriving to seize someone else’s thriving land. These were idealists who died in swamps, buying malarial wasteland with legal tender and draining it by hand, transforming land that had been uninhabitable for centuries into something that could sustain life. By the 1960s, they had finally eradicated malaria from the region — benefiting the entire population.

What They Don’t Want You to Know About Zionism Zionism didn't start in Europe. It started the moment Jews were expelled from Judea. The secret code the rabbis hid in every prayer, meal, and wedding, and why it outlasted every empire that tried to erase it.