Gravity Research Program

Now there is proof that gravity is photonic. Since photons have no mass and carry no energy and the energy released from photon interaction is already contained in matter we can make the link. That hidden energy comes from motion and is otherwise undetectable unless there is some collision or interaction, and any interaction is a collision. So what appears to be gravitational attraction can be stored energy of motion that is otherwise completely undetectable . Now did i achieve the proof ? turns out to be really simple we recently found out that comets and asteroids can be very low density collections of stuff including fine dust that just happens to stay 'at rest" with the other particles in a comet or asteroid. what seems like it could have high density can just be stuff in motion together that seems to be in motion as a solid when it really had few bonds of any kind. We can calculate the gravity of these objects . If two or more of these collections of mass collide with each other than that collusion is gravity dependent or they might only pass through each other. Get it? gravity determines the mass and mass is under the influence of photon activity.

I am now selling gravity in aerosol cans.

I can show you photos from Hubble that clearly show oil and vinigar parts of the universe that don't mix. some parts don't mix because they are both like charged positive or both negative . as for anti mater well that might mean like charges.

My newest law of physics says that kinetic energy of motion when there is no way to determine how fast an object in its own frame of reference is moving actually has an embedded memory in the nucleus of atoms and in its subatomic make up. I am still working on the exact formulation of the law with proof....yes water above a dam knows it is different than water below the dam. This all comes from the previous discovery that photons carry no energy , have no mass and are pure code with the energy seen at a point of intersection with matter deriving from mater and not from the photon. Of course most people including all physicists have no idea what i am talking about
.....no energy transmitted in or by a photon? No mass for the thing and nothing particulate about a photon except the abstract code embedded in it. Once you know i am correct about that then comes kinetic energy being a form of coded memory....not like a battery. although a battery does have dark energy you cannot see till you allow the current to flow from it. The proof comes from Newton's cradle contraption. yes the kinetic energy does retain a kind of resonance that will stay with one of those steel balls for billions of light years once accelerated. It should not change from what is installed in the original thrust making it a projectile. What changes it is influence of gravity , external magnetic fields, interference, other stuff it collides with...etc. so you hit a baseball with the baseball bat and the bat retain much of the kinetic energy from having hit the ball that that batter can feel....and that resonance can remain in the bat for a billion years if it hits the ball out in empty space.

I am working on documenting the radiation exposure event that resulted most likely from solar flares in July that scorched the west side of trees for many square miles in Oregon and Washington at an angle for some duration of time probably also in July. Time is running out to study the phenomenon. I am alone in having discovered it had happened and have requested help from Nasa Space weather and NOAA and have received no response. I have take pictures to show the effect but i don't have the tools to make the measurements nor access to the solar observatory data. It may not have been from the solar flares but the western exposure uniformity suggests that . I have developed a theory about how the heat domes formed as a result of that solar activity and how lensing and rippling of the upper atmosphere from both the initial photon blasts and the later solar wind/ electromagnetic effects would have caused what i am still observing. A shame that no one else believes that what i am observing occurred. It is a first. I have named it the Lex Loeb effect because i discovered it and am the only one doccumenting it. time is being lost to study the imprint made scorching trees because the foliage is falling off. It is actually getting better but soon will all be gone. I save leaves to check for cosmic-ray/ gamma exposure later. It may have been due to lensing of ultraviolet or visible light from an initial surge from the flares over whatever period that lasted for. I suspect it was ultraviolet let in because electromagnetism altered the upper atmosphere rippling it making holes in layers like ozone that were temporary following lines like with the Aurora Borealis. My theory is getting more and more solid because so many trees were affected not from the direction of wind those super hot days because the high pressure was east of where the damage is showing not from the west and not at an angle that can be uniformly measured that seems to track to the sun. I looked up the electromagnetic storm of 1859 and see no observation of scorched trees so i have the first observation of this and link to solar activity. I discovered it because my one hemlock tree seemed to be dying. a few years ago a different hemlock tree died that was planted at the same time. So i was worried i was going to lose another tree that would have to be cut down and noticed that only the west side was scorched and then noticed that trees around it were also scorched on the same side and angle and then i started seeing the same thing everywhere and across the Columbia river. traveling east on the interstate i see the damage traveling west no damage. Then i realize we had a solar radiation event most likely or a cosmic radiation event. I looked up the solar flares that occurred in July and there were two. It takes time for scorched tree foliage to scorch so you can see the damage so I put it at the earlier solar flare recorded but i am no expert on that and need help putting the time line together. this radiation event could have lasted just a minute or less or it could have happened over hours or days even at night. one more clue i had was earlier my solar power electric eyes that turn on light only when it is dark were malfunctioning at night after the solar storm.....that clue came before i saw the tree scorched. Interested i will send photos and really interested get out here and study it while the imprint of lex loeb effect is still visible in the trees. some of my trees just lost the foliage others are just starting to show more damage. not all trees were affected as harshly. if you have to see it to believe it you still can. If you want to study the angle and figure out the timeing the window of opportunity will close soon. So next time we have an EM effect like the one people worry about that can shut down electric grids on earth and destroy communications we should see toasted trees. Lex Loeb effect. I can send pictures most of which are on my phone as i keep making a record when i see the pattern. areas that were shaded by other trees or mountainsides are not affected . someone needs to fly over and record the 'imprint" of the readiation event from above.

I just started to realize that the speed of light constant for light might be totally wrong. Measurements of the speed of light were made in a vacuum and here on earth and probably elsewhere in the solar system it appears to be true but is it a universal truth in the whole cosmos? One might start to question the fact that light travels at this constant speed in a vacuum in the entire universe. Well we do know that light travels slower in various mediums including your fiber optic cable. traveling though water or air in can actually slow down. Einstein suggested that gravity itself could slow down light because he assumed a photon has mass. The theory also went that it could reach it's greatest speed and travel that way an infinite distance at a precise speed of light in a total vacuum. So what is wrong with that?

First of all we don't receive light we view in our telescopes here on ear or nearby the earth that we sent and can't possibly track back to when it was sent to us without assuming constant velocity. If that assumption is wrong it may just turn out that light can speed faster than the speed of light much like these experiment purporting to show atomic particles being in distant places at the exact same time. The way we discovered and tested and rested the thesis that light travels at a uniform speed of light is by having all of our assumptions first in preexistence. we can shine a laser light on the moon and see it from earth shining on the surface and clock it both here on earth and there on the moon similaneously to test the theory and see the constant. but we can't do that to the center of the galaxy or to the next galaxy even if the light arrived there and was reflected back it might be impossible to detect here . I am working on the proof that says that there really is no definite speed of light constant.

https://associatedcontent-lex.blogspot.com/2019/02/living-in-coupled-universe.html

LIVING IN A COUPLED UNIVERSE. DID YOU KNOW ENERGY DOES NOT EXIST WITH OUT MASS? MASS DOES NOT EXIST WITHOUT ENERGY. SPACE DOES NOT EXIST WITHOUT REFERENCE POINTS. REF...

https://gravityresearchprogram-grp.blogspot.com/2019/01/space-time-is-nonsense-in-universe.html

Space Time is Nonsense in a universe where space has no actual metric properties. Einstein Got it Wrong . Super Relativity by Lex Loeb resolves the problem. You have to read a lot of my previous posts to understand my empirical discoveries. Figuring you have I will now quickly explain how mass r...

If you create white light out of red , blue and yellow light you might be able to concentrate it send it in to a prism and get the full spectrum of visible light from that. ROYGBIV. if that is true it leads to a new law of physics. What it means is that material mater resets photon coding , It has nothing to do with energy and more to do with what is "communicated" between subatomic particles. I suspect it is so but I don't know. We know that visible photons can be regenerated as less 'energetic' infrared or regeneration can be higher and lower in frequency and wavelength . I long suspected that reflected light would be down shifted with some of the apparent energy retained by mater in some reserve that could be used for other purposes later. All coding comes form material mater for what should be short range communications with nearby atoms or even plasma....not radiation that spans the entire universe as noise.

A magnet that is not currently an electro magnet is Frozen magnetic disturbance. It is code that is set.

https://gravityresearchprogram-grp.blogspot.com/2018/12/how-photons-lead-to-lex-loebs-super.html