Adam Pollack Attorney At Law

WOODEN v. UNITED STATES
945 F. 3d 498, reversed.
Syllabus

Opinion
[Kagan]
Concurrence
[Sotomayor]
Concurrence
[Kavanaugh]
Concurrence
[Barrett]
Concurrence
[Gorsuch]
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Syllabus

WOODEN v. UNITED STATES

certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit
No. 20–5279. Argued October 4, 2021—Decided March 7, 2022
A jury convicted William Dale Wooden of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U. S. C. §922(g). The Government asked the District Court to sentence Wooden under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). ACCA mandates a 15-year minimum penalty for §922(g) offenders with at least three prior convictions for specified felonies “committed on occasions different from one another.” §924(e)(1). Wooden’s relevant criminal record included ten burglary convictions arising out of a single criminal episode in 1997, during which Wooden had unlawfully entered a one-building storage facility and stolen items from ten different storage units. Prosecutors indicted Wooden on ten counts of burglary—one for each storage unit—and Wooden pleaded guilty to all counts. Years later, at Wooden’s sentencing hearing on his §922(g) conviction, the District Court applied ACCA’s penalty enhancement in accordance with the Government’s view that Wooden had commenced a new “occasion” of criminal activity each time he left one storage unit and entered another. The resulting sentence was almost sixteen years, much higher than the statutory maximum for Wooden’s crime absent such an enhancement. The Sixth Circuit affirmed, reasoning that ACCA’s occasions clause is satisfied whenever crimes take place at different moments in time—that is, sequentially rather than simultaneously.

Held: Wooden’s ten burglary offenses arising from a single criminal episode did not occur on different “occasions” and thus count as only one prior conviction for purposes of ACCA. Pp. 4–15.

(a) Wooden’s successive burglaries occurred on one “occasion” under a natural construction of that term. An ordinary person using language in its normal way would describe Wooden’s entries into the stor age units as happening on a single occasion, rather than on ten “occasions different from one another.” §924(e)(1). The Government’s contention that an “occasion” ends at the discrete moment when an offense’s elements are established contravenes the ordinary usage of the word. An occasion may itself encompass multiple, temporally distinct activities. For example, the occasion of a wedding may include a ceremony, cocktail hour, dinner, and dancing. Those activities need not—and often do not—occur simultaneously; yet they nevertheless compose one occasion. The same is true for sequential criminal offenses. Indeed, the Court has often used the word “occasion” to encompass multiple, temporally discrete offenses. See, e.g., United States v. Bryant, 579 U. S. 140, 151. The Government’s contrary view—that each sequential offense forms its own “occasion”—can make someone a career offender in the space of a minute. But that view goes far toward collapsing ACCA’s two separate statutory conditions for imposing an enhanced penalty on a §922(g) offender. ACCA’s enhancement kicks in only if (1) the offender has three previous convictions for specified felonies; and (2) those predicate felonies were committed on “occasions different from one another.” §924(e)(1). The Government’s approach would largely collapse the two conditions and give ACCA’s three-occasions requirement no work to do. Pp. 5–7.

(b) Given what “occasion” ordinarily means, whether criminal activities occurred on one occasion or different occasions requires a multi-factored inquiry that may depend on a range of circumstances, including timing, location, and the character and relationship of the offenses. For the most part, the determination will be straightforward and intuitive. In many cases, a single factor—especially of time or place—can decisively differentiate occasions. In hard cases, the inquiry may involve keeping an eye on ACCA’s history and purpose. Here, every relevant consideration shows that Wooden burglarized ten storage units on a single occasion. Indeed it was because the burglaries “ar[ose] from the same conduct” that Georgia law required the prosecutor to charge all ten in a single indictment. Ga. Code Ann. §16–1–7(b). Pp. 8–9.

(c) Statutory history and purpose confirm the Court’s view of the occasions clause’s meaning, as well as the Court’s conclusion that Wooden is not a career offender. Congress added the occasions clause only after a court applied ACCA’s enhancement to Samuel Petty—an offender who, much like Wooden, was convicted of multiple counts of robbery for one night in one restaurant. See United States v. Petty, 798 F. 2d 1157. Petty sought review in this Court, and the Solicitor General confessed error, stating that ACCA should not be construed to reach multiple felony convictions arising out of a single criminal episode. Shortly thereafter, Congress amended ACCA to require that the requisite offenses occur on “occasions different from one another.” Minor and Technical Criminal Law Amendments Act of 1988, §7056, 102 Stat. 4402. That statutory change, rejecting the original outcome in Petty in light of the Solicitor General’s confession of error, is at odds with the Government’s current view of the occasions clause. The Government attempts to distinguish the facts of Petty, but nothing about the Solicitor General’s confession of error, or Congress’s amendment of ACCA, suggests any concern for whether an offender’s crimes were committed simultaneously or sequentially. Instead, each was based on another idea—that a person who has robbed a restaurant, and done nothing else, is not a career offender. The history of the occasions clause thus aligns with what this Court has always recognized as ACCA’s purpose: to address the “special danger” posed by the eponymous “armed career criminal.” Begay v. United States, 553 U. S. 137, 146. Wooden’s burglary of a single storage facility does not suggest that kind of danger, any more than Petty’s robbery of a single restaurant did. Pp. 10–14.

945 F. 3d 498, reversed.

Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined, and in which Thomas, Alito, and Barrett, JJ., joined as to all but Part II–B. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion. Kavanaugh, J., filed a concurring opinion. Barrett, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Thomas, J., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Sotomayor, J., joined as to Parts II, III, and IV.

Wrongful Convictions: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kpYYdCzTpps

Wrongful Convictions: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) John Oliver explains why it’s so difficult to be exonerated for a wrongful conviction, even when there’s compelling evidence to prove your innocence, and how...

Supreme Court sides with murder defendant in major evidentiary ruling

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/590639-supreme-court-sides-with-murder-defendant-in-major-evidentiary

Supreme Court sides with murder defendant in major evidentiary ruling The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with a murder defendant who the justices found was denied his constitutional right to confront a key witness that prosecutors had relied on to secure his conviction.

Federal judge rules Virginia’s restricted access to court records violates First Amendment

https://www.jurist.org/news/2022/01/federal-judge-rules-virginias-restricted-access-to-court-records-violates-first-amendment/

Federal judge rules Virginia’s restricted access to court records violates First Amendment A district court judge in Virginia on Friday found Virginia’s online civil court system violated First Amendment rights of the press and public because of the system’s restricted access to newly filed...

The FBI Knew Exactly What Its “Double Agent” Was Doing, Says A Defendant In The Michigan Kidnapping Case

The FBI Knew Exactly What Its “Double Agent” Was Doing, Says A Defendant In The Michigan Kidnapping Case Prosecutors say the informant’s statements should be barred from court, but defense attorneys have other ideas.

Pittsburgh City Council Bans Traffic Stops For Minor Offenses To Make Stops 'Equitable' - The Police Tribune

Pittsburgh City Council Bans Traffic Stops For Minor Offenses To Make Stops 'Equitable' - The Police Tribune Pittsburgh, PA – The Pittsburgh City Council voted 8-to-1 on Tuesday night to pass a bill that will prohibit police officers from stopping vehicles for secondary violations like out of date inspections or broken taillights. Pittsburgh City Councilman Ricky Burgess, who sponsored the bill, said the...

Louisiana governor pardons Plessy of landmark Supreme Court case 125 years later

https://www.jurist.org/news/2022/01/lousiana-governor-pardons-plessy-of-landmark-supreme-court-case-125-years-later/

Louisiana governor pardons Plessy of landmark Supreme Court case 125 years later Lousiana Governor John Bel Edwards announced Wednesday that he was signing a posthumous pardon for Homer A. Plessy, the plaintiff in the landmark 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy was arrested in 1...

'Indian country' prosecutions, juries' racial makeup among issues facing Iowa Supreme Court in new term

https://www.press-citizen.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2021/09/14/new-iowa-supreme-court-term-starts-faces-issues-transgender-bathrooms-covid-mandates/5759662001/?utm_source=press-citizen-Daily%20Briefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily_briefing&utm_term=list_article_thumb&utm_content=1033PC-E-NLETTER65

'Indian country' prosecutions, juries' racial makeup among issues facing Iowa Supreme Court in new term Issues before the high court in its 2021-2022 term include transgender Iowan's bathroom access, public records cases. Oral arguments begin Sept. 15.

ACLU sues Chicago Police for release of social media monitoring records

https://www.jurist.org/news/2021/07/aclu-sues-chicago-police-for-release-of-social-media-monitoring-records/

ACLU sues Chicago Police for release of social media monitoring records The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Illinois sued the Chicago Police Department (CPD) Thursday to turn over records related to the department’s social media monitoring task force that was for...

The Supreme Court delivers a victory for property rights in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid | Pacific Legal Foundation

https://pacificlegal.org/supreme-court-victory-cedar-point-nursery-v-hassid/

The Supreme Court delivers a victory for property rights in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid | Pacific Legal Foundation The United States Supreme Court decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid has major implications for property rights.

Supreme Court Rules Cheerleader's F-Bombs Are Protected By The 1st Amendment

https://www.npr.org/2021/06/23/1001382019/supreme-court-rules-cheerleaders-f-bombs-are-protected-by-the-first-amendment

Supreme Court Rules Cheerleader's F-Bombs Are Protected By The 1st Amendment The case involved a teenage cheerleader who dropped F-bombs on Snapchat. At issue was whether schools may punish students for speech that occurs online and off campus but that may be disruptive.

Supreme Court Restricts Police Powers To Enter A Home Without A Warrant

Supreme Court Restricts Police Powers To Enter A Home Without A Warrant The court has long held that police may do this when pursuing a fleeing felon. The question in this case was whether they can do the same thing when pursuing someone suspected of a minor offense.

NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSN. v. ALSTON

The days of the NCAA engaging in illegal anticompetitive tactics in violation of antitrust laws, in order to suppress the ability of college athletes to obtain wages and compensation for their labor, appears to be coming to an end.:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-512#writing-20-512_OPINION_4

NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSN. v. ALSTON NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. S...

US Supreme Court limits new trials for felons in possession of firearm

https://www.jurist.org/news/2021/06/us-supreme-court-limits-new-trials-for-felons-in-possession-of-firearm/

US Supreme Court limits new trials for felons in possession of firearm The US Supreme Court on Monday limited new trials for felons convicted for being in possession of a firearm, limiting the retroactive application of its 2019 decision Rehaif v. United States. The issu...

US Supreme Court rules First Step Act does not expand crack cocaine sentencing reform

https://www.jurist.org/news/2021/06/us-supreme-court-rules-first-step-act-does-not-expand-crack-cocaine-sentencing-reform/

US Supreme Court rules First Step Act does not expand crack cocaine sentencing reform The US Supreme Court held on Monday that sentence reduction under the First Step Act is available only if an offender's prior conviction for a crack cocaine offense triggered a mandatory minimum sente...

US Supreme Court rules reckless offenses do not qualify as ‘violent felony’

https://www.jurist.org/news/2021/06/us-supreme-court-rules-reckless-offenses-do-not-qualify-as-violent-felony/

US Supreme Court rules reckless offenses do not qualify as ‘violent felony’ The US Supreme Court on Thursday overturned a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit that 'reckless' crimes qualify as violent felonies for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act (...

BORDEN v. UNITED STATES

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/19-5410#writing-19-5410_OPINION_4

BORDEN v. UNITED STATES NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. S...

Court rejects private lawyer phone consult prior to charges

Court rejects private lawyer phone consult prior to charges DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowans have no right to a confidential telephone conversation with a lawyer prior to charges being filed, the state Supreme Court ruled Friday, dealing a blow to attorney-client privilege.

Don't be one of these guys.

Unusual Supreme Court majority narrows scope of anti-hacking computer law

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-06-03/unusual-supreme-court-majority-narrows-scope-of-anti-hacking-computer-law

Unusual Supreme Court majority narrows scope of anti-hacking computer law A 6-3 ruling limits computer fraud law to those who wrongly gain access to confidential files, not those who misuse data they're authorized to see.

VAN BUREN v. UNITED STATES

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-06-03/unusual-supreme-court-majority-narrows-scope-of-anti-hacking-computer-law

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/19-783#writing-19-783_SYLLABUS

VAN BUREN v. UNITED STATES NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. S...

US Supreme Court rules against suppressing evidence found by tribal police on federal highways

https://www.jurist.org/news/2021/06/us-supreme-court-rules-against-suppressing-evidence-found-by-tribal-police-on-federal-highways/

US Supreme Court rules against suppressing evidence found by tribal police on federal highways The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Tuesday that tribal police officers have the authority to detain and search non-Indigenous persons on federal highways within their territories. The decision qui...

Supreme Court rejects challenge to convictions under "racist Jim Crow" jury laws

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-rejects-challenge-convictions-racist-jim-crow-jury-laws/

Supreme Court rejects challenge to convictions under "racist Jim Crow" jury laws The decision in Edwards v. Vannoy leaves in limbo hundreds of people convicted in Louisiana and Oregon by non-unanimous juries

Supreme Court rules warrantless home gun confiscation is unconstitutional in 9-0 vote | American Military News

Supreme Court rules warrantless home gun confiscation is unconstitutional in 9-0 vote | American Military News The Supreme Court ruled Monday that warrantless gun confiscation from Americans' homes is unconstitutional, voting unanimously on the side of a Rhode