Illini Rhythm Syndicate

Which charts do I miss? 🤔

The number 135 carries a sense of mystery across a few different fields, ranging from a fascinating mathematical anomaly to a piece of modern pop-culture horror. Because it shows up in a few distinct areas, the “mystery” you are referring to likely points to one of three things: 1. The Mathematical AnomalyIn mathematics, 135 is special because it is one of the very few numbers that equals the sum of its individual digits raised to consecutive powers. Here is how the equation breaks down: 1^1 + 3^2 + 5^3 = 1 + 9 + 125 = 135

Numbers with this unique property are extremely rare and are often categorized as a variant of Armstrong numbers or “Eureka numbers.”

The Numerological MeaningIn the realm of numerology and New Age spirituality, 135 is considered an “angel number.” Practitioners believe that seeing 135 repeatedly is a spiritual message signaling impending change, personal growth, and a push to embrace creativity. To be candid, while there is no scientific or factual basis for angel numbers, many people find comfort and personal meaning in looking to these numeric patterns for guidance. Which of these mysteries, the mathematical rarity, the horror story, or the numerological meaning, were you hoping to dig into today?

Cover art credit: https://x.com/wwemndy/status/1849034390254571773

Scores taken from members of and

The ultimate paradox of Pandora’s box lies in the very last thing left inside it: Hope.

When Pandora opened the pithos (the large storage jar, later mistranslated as a “box”), she accidentally unleashed all the evils, diseases, and hardships of the world upon humanity. Terrified, she slammed the lid shut, trapping only Hope inside.

The paradox lies in a deceptively difficult question: Is Hope a blessing or a curse?

Depending on how you interpret the myth, this ending changes the entire meaning of human existence. If the jar was strictly a container for evils meant to punish mankind (as Zeus intended), then Hope itself must be an evil.

Under this interpretation, Hope is the most cruel affliction of all. By keeping Hope trapped inside the box, Pandora inadvertently saved humanity from it. If Hope had been released, humans would be perpetually tortured by unrealistic expectations, constantly wishing for a better future that will never come. By staying in the jar, Hope is kept away from us, meaning humanity is spared from absolute, blinding delusion.

Conversely, if Hope is a good thing, the only antidote to the swarm of miseries just unleashed, then trapping it inside the jar means humanity is left completely defenseless. If Hope remains locked away, it means we do not actually possess it in the world. We are left to suffer from disease, old age, and strife, completely devoid of the one mechanism that makes those sufferings bearable. That is truly Pandora’s paradox.

Cover art credit: https://x.com/matagi_14/status/1958493373397922032

In measure theory, a branch of mathematics, the Lebesgue measure, named after French mathematician Henri Lebesgue, is the standard way of assigning a measure to subsets of higher dimensional Euclidean n-spaces. For lower dimensions n = 1, 2, 3, it coincides with the standard measure of length, area, or volume. In general, it is also called n-dimensional volume, n-volume, hypervolume, or simply volume. It is used throughout real analysis, in particular to define Lebesgue integration. Sets that can be assigned a Lebesgue measure are called Lebesgue-measurable; the measure of the Lebesgue-measurable set A is here denoted by λ(A).

Reel cover credit: https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/132880911 by akizzZ on pixiv

#チュウニズム

Maximum power point tracking (MPPT), or sometimes just power point tracking (PPT), is a technique used with variable power sources to maximize energy extraction as conditions vary.The technique is most commonly used with photovoltaic (PV) solar systems but can also be used with wind turbines, optical power transmission and thermophotovoltaics.

PV solar systems have varying relationships to inverter systems, external grids, battery banks, and other electrical loads. The central problem addressed by MPPT is that the efficiency of power transfer from the solar cell depends on the amount of available sunlight, shading, solar panel temperature and the load’s electrical characteristics. As these conditions vary, the load characteristic (impedance) that gives the highest power transfer changes. The system is optimized when the load characteristic changes to keep power transfer at highest efficiency. This optimal load characteristic is called the maximum power point (MPP). MPPT is the process of adjusting the load characteristic as the conditions change. Circuits can be designed to present optimal loads to the photovoltaic cells and then convert the voltage, current, or frequency to suit other devices or systems.

Solar cells’ non-linear relationship between temperature and total resistance can be analyzed based on the Current-voltage (I-V) curve and the power-voltage (P-V) curves. MPPT samples cell output and applies the proper resistance (load) to obtain maximum power. MPPT devices are typically integrated into an electric power converter system that provides voltage or current conversion, filtering, and regulation for driving various loads, including power grids, batteries, or motors. Solar inverters convert DC power to AC power and may incorporate MPPT.

Cover art credit: https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/128691860

The split operator method is a numerical technique used to solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics. It is particularly useful for simulating the evolution of quantum systems in real time, especially in cases where analytical solutions are not readily available or computationally feasible. The method gets its name from the fact that it “splits” the time evolution operator into simpler, more manageable components.
The split operator method approximates the time evolution of the wave function by discretizing both time and space and breaking down the time evolution operator into manageable steps. The basic idea is to alternate between applying operators that govern the kinetic and potential energy parts of the Schrödinger equation.

Time evolution: The time evolution operator is split into two steps, one involving the kinetic operator and the other involving the potential operator. The time evolution over a small time step Δt is given by:
Ψ(x,t+Δt)=exp(−iℏ^TΔt) * exp(−iℏ^VΔt)Ψ(x,t)

Repeat: Iterate the time evolution step for the desired duration of the simulation, updating the wave function at each time step.
By alternating the kinetic and potential operators in this way, the split operator method provides a simple and efficient way to solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. It is particularly useful for simulating the behavior of quantum systems with time-dependent potentials or studying the dynamics of wave packets in various quantum systems. However, it’s important to note that the accuracy of the method depends on the choice of time and spatial discretization, as well as the size of the time steps used. In some cases, additional techniques like adaptive time-stepping or higher-order finite difference methods may be employed to improve accuracy and efficiency.

Reel cover art credit: https://x.com/robetReivE/status/2053807341275943299

In quantum information and computation, the Solovay–Kitaev theorem says that if a set of single-qubit quantum gates generates a dense subgroup of SU(2), then that set can be used to approximate any desired quantum gate with a short sequence of gates that can also be found efficiently. This theorem is considered one of the most significant results in the field of quantum computation and was first announced by Robert M. Solovay in 1995 and independently proven by Alexei Kitaev in 1997. Michael Nielsen and Christopher M. Dawson have noted its importance in the field.

A consequence of this theorem is that a quantum circuit of m constant-qubit gates can be approximated to ε error (in operator norm) by a quantum circuit of O(mlog^c⁡(m/ε)) gates from a desired finite universal gate set (where c is a constant). By comparison, just knowing that a gate set is universal only implies that constant-qubit gates can be approximated by a finite circuit from the gate set, with no bound on its length. So, the Solovay–Kitaev theorem shows that this approximation can be made surprisingly efficient, thereby justifying that quantum computers need only implement a finite number of gates to gain the full power of quantum computation.

Reel cover credit: https://x.com/eeaaabocide/status/2052015860970332292/

Edge detection includes a variety of mathematical methods that aim at identifying edges, defined as curves in a digital image at which the image brightness changes sharply or, more formally, has discontinuities. The same problem of finding discontinuities in one-dimensional signals is known as step detection and the problem of finding signal discontinuities over time is known as change detection. Edge detection is a fundamental tool in image processing, machine vision and computer vision, particularly in the areas of feature detection and feature extraction.

Canny edge detection applied to a photograph
The purpose of detecting sharp changes in image brightness is to capture important events and changes in properties of the world. It can be shown that under rather general assumptions for an image formation model, discontinuities in image brightness are likely to correspond to:

Discontinuities in depth,
Discontinuities in surface orientation,
Changes in material properties and variations in scene illumination.

In the ideal case, the result of applying an edge detector to an image may lead to a set of connected curves that indicate the boundaries of objects, the boundaries of surface markings as well as curves that correspond to discontinuities in surface orientation. Thus, applying an edge detection algorithm to an image may significantly reduce the amount of data to be processed and may therefore filter out information that may be regarded as less relevant, while preserving the important structural properties of an image. If the edge detection step is successful, the subsequent task of interpreting the information contents in the original image may therefore be substantially simplified. However, it is not always possible to obtain such ideal edges from real life images of moderate complexity.

Reel cover credit: https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/125607830

Trying to be a little different today.

But anyways here’s the physics yapping:
In quantum physics, Fermi’s golden rule is a formula that describes the transition rate (the probability of a transition per unit time) from one energy eigenstate of a quantum system to a group of energy eigenstates in a continuum, as a result of a weak perturbation. This transition rate is effectively independent of time (so long as the strength of the perturbation is independent of time) and is proportional to the strength of the coupling between the initial and final states of the system (described by the square of the matrix element of the perturbation) as well as the density of states. It is also applicable when the final state is discrete, i.e. it is not part of a continuum, if there is some decoherence in the process, like relaxation or collision of the atoms, or like noise in the perturbation, in which case the density of states is replaced by the reciprocal of the decoherence bandwidth.

Fermi’s golden rule describes a system that begins in an eigenstate |i⟩ of an unperturbed Hamiltonian H0 and considers the effect of a perturbing Hamiltonian H’ applied to the system. If H’ is time-independent, the system goes only into those states in the continuum that have the same energy as the initial state. If H’ is oscillating sinusoidally as a function of time (i.e. it is a harmonic perturbation) with an angular frequency ω, the transition is into states with energies that differ by ħω from the energy of the initial state. The standard way to derive the equation is to start with time-dependent perturbation theory and to take the limit for absorption under the assumption that the time of the measurement is much larger than the time needed for the transition.

Reel cover credit: https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/140490117

In optics, the Fresnel diffraction equation for near-field diffraction is an approximation of the Kirchhoff–Fresnel diffraction that can be applied to the propagation of waves in the near field. It is used to calculate the diffraction pattern created by waves passing through an aperture or around an object, when viewed from relatively close to the object. In contrast the diffraction pattern in the far field region is given by the Fraunhofer diffraction equation.

The near field can be specified by the Fresnel number, F, of the optical arrangement. When
F≪1, the diffracted wave is considered to be in the Fraunhofer field. However, the validity of the Fresnel diffraction integral is deduced by the approximations derived below. Specifically, the phase terms of third order and higher must be negligible, a condition that may be written as Fθ^2/4≪1 where θ is the maximal angle described by θ≈a/L, a and L the same as in the definition of the Fresnel number.

The multiple Fresnel diffraction at closely spaced periodical ridges (ridged mirror) causes the specular reflection; this effect can be used for atomic mirrors.

Reel cover credit: https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/142949221