Mastercraft Computer and Recording Studio Lagos

Never envy them when they flaunt cash around, their ways of earning is not same as yours. All glitters is not gold!

🚨 EFCC Arrests 35 Suspected Internet Fraudsters in Auchi 🚨

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has arrested 35 individuals suspected of internet fraud in Auchi, Edo State. Operatives carried out the arrests in areas including Vigilante Street, off Sabo Ibenafo Road, and Back of Yak.

Recovered items at the scene:
🔹 9 cars
🔹 11 laptop computers
🔹 46 mobile phones
🔹 2 smartwatches

The suspects will face charges once investigations are concluded.

THE EFCC’S COMEDY OF ERRORS: A LEGAL BREAKDOWN OF ABSURDITIES

Once again, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has taken center stage—not as a law enforcement agency, but as a caricature of one—following its questionable arrest and detention of social commentator, Martins Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM). Let’s examine their official explanation and expose the inconsistencies, legal flaws, and shallow justifications, beginning with their governing law, due process, and basic logic.

1. WHERE IS THE PETITION?
EFCC’s Claim: “We received multiple petitions alleging financial crimes…”
The Truth: According to VDM’s legal counsel, Deji Adeyanju, the EFCC openly admitted that no such petition was on record.
Legal Perspective: Section 6(b) of the EFCC Act states that its investigative authority is activated only upon receipt of a complaint or credible information. Without a petition, what sparked their action? Are we now embracing anticipatory witch-hunts?
Conclusion: No petition, no legal footing. The EFCC is casting its net in an empty ocean.

2. INVITATIONS OR POST-HOC JUSTIFICATIONS?
EFCC’s Claim: “He failed to respond to several invitations…”
Reality Check: There’s no proof of service. Neither VDM nor his legal representatives acknowledged receiving any invitation. This appears to be an after-the-fact excuse.
Legal Requirement: The Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), Order 2 Rule 1, requires proper notification before any lawful arrest.
Critical Question: Through what means were these so-called invitations sent—Email? Text? Smoke signals?

3. BAIL FOR AN UNKNOWN OFFENCE?
EFCC’s Claim: “He has been granted administrative bail.”
Logical Fallacy: Bail typically follows arrest based on a clear allegation or charge—not vague claims or invisible petitions.
Legal Contradiction: Section 41 of the EFCC Act mandates that suspects be informed of the reason for their arrest. Has this been fulfilled? Even the EFCC seems uncertain.
Bottom Line:

Happy birthday

Happy birthday to you

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT!!!

ANAMBRA STATE GOVERNMENT HAS NOT AUTHORIZED THE TRENDING ANNOUNCEMENT ON WOMEN WHO DO NOT WEAR UNDERWEAR.

The trending announcement by the town crier in Abagana, Njikoka LGA, wherein the announcer stated that ladies who move about without underwear (bra and pants) would be arrested, is neither from the State government nor Agunechemba Security Outfit.

Such trivial matters do not have any legal support and cannot be the focus of the State government or its law enforcement agencies at this time it is focused on ridding the State of every form of criminality. While this is not to encourage indecent dressing in our communities, it is important to make this clarification so as not to derail the focus of our law enforcement under any pretext.

Kindly disregard any such distracting announcement and remember to continue supporting the Security Agencies with credible information on criminals around our communities — if you see something, say something!

—
ANELE NWIBO
Charles Chukwuma Soludo

GOD is Good

Amen